Posts Tagged ‘Minutes’

GSC Meeting 2008-02-27

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

Proceedings of the February 27th, 2008 GSC meeting


Agenda

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Anwei!)

2) 6:00 Welcome with introductions (Kristina)

3) 6:05 Announcements (Kristina)
i. Please be aware that all meetings are recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approve minutes from the last meeting (2/20/07).
iii. Happy birthday Euan!

4) 6:10 Funding (Polina)
i. Spicmacay
ii. Stanford Street Law
iii. Stanford India Association
iv. Undergraduate Product Design Student Association

5) 6:25 Swearing in new Law rep (Kristina)

6) 6:30 Elections Oversight (Adam B.)

7) 6:35 Face painters for Easter Egg Roll (Kristina)

8) 6:40 Graduate Student Elections (Ivette)

9) 6:55 ASSU Update (Mondaire)

10) 7:00 Programming update (Adam S. and Justin)

11) 7:05 Stipend update (Adam B.)

12) 7:10 Health Care Updates (Kristina)

13) 7:15 New Business

Attendance

Voting members present:
At large 1: Maxim Afanasyev
At large 2: Hanna Muenke
At large 3: Kristina Keating
At large 5: Polina Segalova
Business: Rhyan Uy
Earth Sciences: Kyle Anderson
Engineering 1: Melahn Parker
Engineering 2: Zeng Fan
Humanities: George Bloom
Law: Andrew Park
Medicine: Yana Hoy (proxy Donna Winston present)
Natural Sciences: Fen Zhao
Social Sciences: Euan Robertson

Voting members not present:
At large 4: Lan Wei
Education: Michelle Brown

Others in attendance: Rachel Velcoff, Adam Beberg, Adam Sciambi, Justin Brown, Divya Bhangara, Alia Naim, Akshat Gupta, Tanmay Mishra, Nikhil Ravi, Khanthi Kode, Susana Montes, Anwei Chai, Tom Sze, Maria Spletter,

Minutes

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Anwei!)

2) 6:01 Welcome with introductions (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

We add which department we’re in, and why we’re here today.

3) 6:03 Announcements (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

i. Please be aware that all meetings are recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approved minutes from the last meeting (2/20/08) by consensus.
iii. Happy birthday Euan!

4) 6:04 Funding (Polina)

Listen to this segment

i. Spicmacay – Having a music festival in May, with two artists. Last year had troupe of dancers, this year inviting two musicians representing different kinds of classical music. Recommending $3570, somewhat lower than their requested amount, due to the expected size of the event. Giving $3570 passes by consensus.
ii. Stanford Street Law – One of our service groups on campus. Teach classes at Juvenile Hall, Community School (kids on probation), Girls Camp (also juvi) on different aspects of the law. Teach kids about their rights and responsibilities under the law. Go 9 times each semester. Recommended $2095. Giving $2095 passes by consensus.
iii. Stanford India Association – SIA cultural events. Had intended to have a sports event, but were unable to get fields due to a Frisbee tournament, so will have lower key social event instead. Will be around Lake Lag. Recommended $1000. Giving $1000 passes by consensus.
iv. Undergraduate Product Design Student Association – Not here
v. Special Fees – One of the Club Sports groups forgot a line item for the budget that we voted on last week, so would like us to modify their budget to add $4000. This increase would still be within their 10% increase. $202,070.80 would be new total. Requires role call vote.
10 for, 0 opposed, 1 abstaining. Passes.

5) 6:14 Swearing in new Law rep (Euan)

Listen to this segment

Andrew Park is sworn in as new law rep, and can now vote.

6) 6:15 Elections Oversight (Adam B.)

Listen to this segment

Original issue at hand about enforcing petitioning period was resolved, so Adam B. gives an update instead. For Grad students running for GSC, basically need to sign-up by March 29th, and then we’d be on the ballot. Some issues of behavior during campaign week that sometimes lead to disqualifications, but not usually from the grad students. Need to be careful in that there are many more rules and earlier deadlines for Undergrads running for positions, and want to make sure that grad students know that these don’t apply to them.

7) 6:20 Face painters for Easter Egg Roll (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

Andy would like to hire two face painters for a total cost of $700, $350 from us, rest from GLO. Plan to use extra money from Thanksgiving dinner to cover that. This is all they’re asking us to contribute to the Easter Egg Roll, which is otherwise funded by the Provost’s office. Questions about why face painters should cost that much, no one really knows. Kristina will check with Andy, but recommends that we vote on it anyway. 1 objection to consensus, so we vote.
11 for, 2 opposed, 0 abstaining. Passes.

8) 6:24 Graduate Student Elections (Ivette)

Listen to this segment

Listen to this segment

Has created a plan of attack for graduate student elections, focusing on graduate candidate recruitment and graduate voter recruitment.

i. Graduate Candidate Recruitment
Major focus will be on recruiting GSC candidates, though grad students can also run for ASSU president/vice president, which would have earlier deadline.

a. Advertise with the goal of making people aware of the positions available. Counting on GSC members to recruit peers. Will also get in touch with leaders of student groups. Polina has a list of Financial Officers, Fen has a list of presidents (though it might be outdated), and Nanci Howe of OSA should have a list of contacts for student groups as well. Ryan will put an obvious link on the elections website for graduate students interested in running, because it is a different process with different deadlines than the Undergrads. Right now, the link will just be a link to email Ivette. However, more information about how Graduate students can sign up will also be posted, so that students can declare candidacy online.

b. Hold independent candidate information session geared toward GSC candidates, with the goal of providing specific information about the elections process for Graduate students. Suggestion to have this before March 14th, since after that will be finals, and spring break, followed quickly by elections.
Will also create a separate Candidate and Voter Guide for Graduate Students, which will outline the important information for running and voting.

ii. Graduate Voter Recruitment
Will be focused on a number of events:

a. Meet the candidates pub night
Have each GSC candidate give a brief presentation, followed by a brief Q & A, followed by social time in the pub, potentially with drink tickets. Thinking of Thursday, April 3, 2008, 7-9pm. Donna reports that one year, they had the candidates available, and if people came and talked to some of them, then they got a drink bracelet, which got them deals at downtown bars.

b. Rock the Vote! (organized by entire Elections Commission)
Big concert in White Plaza, open to everyone, to promote the vote. Will be on Friday, April 4th @ 5pm

c. Vote and Dine
General idea is to catch students and make it easy for them to vote, even if the students might not have made the effort to do so on their own. Plan to have a social event with music, food/drink, and computers with access to online ballot. Probably hold them in Rains, EV and/or Lyman Wed and/or Thurs, April 9th and 10th, @ 7pm-9pm, when election poles are open. Might also be possible to do this during the day at on-campus eateries, or at least, do targeted advertising at lunch time, but would need more volunteers for that (possibly non-returning GSC members, or a couple hired people).
Suggestion to ask folks at gym to set up a computer so that people can vote there.
Suggestion to ask CAs if they’d be interested in organizing the social events for voting, but elections commission would chip in for that.

iii. General Advertisement Techniques

- Flyers in graduate eateries, graduate school buildings, graduate residences. Probably get GSC members to help distribute these, as we are, by definition, from a variety of schools.
- Grad Events (via GSC), sent out each Monday morning
- Grad Announce (via Graduate Life Office), send out monthly. See if Ken will send it out during voting time that month.
- Target student groups.
- Facebook
- Signs in Marguerite

iv. Proposed Graduate Elections Events Timeline

mid-March GSC candidate information session (pending)
before campaign week Candidate Handbook Statements due
Wed, April 2nd Campaign Week Begins, 12:01am
Thurs, April 3rd Meet the Candidates Pub Night, 7-9pm
Fri, April 4th Rock the Vote!, 5pm
Wed & Thur, April 9th & 10th Election poles open, Vote & Dine, 7-9pm

Took break for a programming update around 6:40, come back at 6:48, finished this discussion at 6:58. However, all notes are written in one piece above.

9) 6:40 Programming update (Adam S. and Justin)

Listen to this segment

Yay to to the two of them on a very successful grad formal! Had 1203 people in attendance, somewhat lower than the ticket office’s initial report. Cheeseballs were the band (80s and 90s cover). There was lots of fun space for dancing, got the floor shaking! Many thanks to Melahn, Fen and Euan for helping out with set-up and/or clean-up.

Among other expenses, went through 50 handles of alcohol in 45 minutes, and then had to leave to buy 50 more, 1 ambulance… Spent $48,429.26 total, GSC put in $16000, GSPB gave us $2000. Ticket sales netted $26,890. We think we’ll get venue deposit back (despite gross floor), and we’ll lose a couple of hundred for ticket office taking their percentage, and will probably end up about $3500 over budget, which is a big improvement over last year. Many of the tickets were sold at the $30+ rate, so it might be possible to raise prices next year, though there were about 500 tickets sold at $20 rate, which started getting the word out, which probably helped build it up to such a successful event. They think there should be a bigger budget for the formal next year, especially given how many people it reached, and the things that they had to cut back on this year to meet the budget, such as cleaning up with only three people, because hiring help would have cost an additional $1000.

At some point will vote to cover the rest of the cost, but will wait until they have a more exact figure.

At 6:48 back to elections. Notes above.

10) 6:58 ASSU Update (Mondaire) – not here

11) 6:59 Stipend update (Adam B.)

Listen to this segment

They have been talking to financial aid people, and talked to the VPGE today about their concerns for stipends. The Provost also has numbers in his hands. Nothing definite, but hoping for decent increase in stipends minimum.

The new Grad student guide has estimated costs for new graduate students. They’re saying 300 a month total for all personal things, and also have lower estimated transportation costs than might be the case, and even with that, come up with an estimated cost for a single student of $7289 per quarter total. If you take taxes into account (giving a stipend such that the after tax amount would be $7289 per quarter), then that would already be a decent stipend increase.

Adam surveyed about 20 people with some financial questions, which included GSC members, other Engineers, and some random people. He broke the data down into approximate quintiles, roughly reflected by Families, Couples, Engineers, Scientists, Humanities, and considered the three middle groups for his averages.

Based on the averages from Adam’s survey, University’s housing estimate is accurate, as is health insurance (not hard, given that the University provides those things), but transportation and travel/entertainment/other are higher than University thinks. Leaving off the extremes, respondents to the survey reported spending about $3050 average a month. Of that middle group, only 20% live off their stipend + grant + health insurance – taxes subsidy alone. Most others get an average of $1300 per month in other income, whether through loans or through work. 40% work outside jobs, including some substantial ones, based on incomes reported for those jobs. While the survey is small n, it’s consistent with what we were thinking anyway, based on ideas gathered from the larger scale survey last year, and is allowing us to see those trends at a more specific level. Reported worry level was 5.5/10 average, though this was very bimodal, with people tending to be very worried, or not worried, with fewer people in between. Many respondents reported having stipends that were already over the minimum stipend, and were still having a hard time, offering further evidence that those at minimum stipends are challenged.

International students in general probably have a harder time with finances, because it’s more difficult getting jobs outside the University, getting loans, and they may have spouses who are unable work to in this country.

There is some financial aid available for graduate students, though primarily related to emergencies, such as unexpected medical costs.

Adam B. would like to continue to work on this survey, getting some more respondents, and doing some refining of the questions. Will also do this again in the fall potentially.

There’s the question of how random the sample is for the survey so far, and that those who feel most motivated to get higher stipends (i.e. are having the hardest time) would be the most likely to fill out the survey, leading to a biased sample. Euan would like to see an event, and then force everyone there to fill out the survey, in order to get a random sample. However, given the sensitive nature of finances, and the fact that people might need to look at their financial records to fill out the survey accurately, this might not work so well.

Justin questions the high transportation costs, with the point that it’s a bit of a luxury to have a car. However, the fact remains that many students do have cars, and that it is part of their expenses. Adam’s survey brings transportation costs somewhat higher perhaps, because it adds an amount for car depreciation, which grad students probably don’t think about in a typical month, since it doesn’t affect their month expenses directly.

12) 7:20 Health Care Updates (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

Working on another survey, small-scale, being targeted at grad students with dependents, focusing on health care and finances. Also asking about family life issues (child care, events, etc). If you have ideas for questions, let Kristina know. Will go out to everyone, but targeting those with dependents. Follow-up to big survey before, with some things that we realized were missing. Looking to get the survey finished by the Easter Egg Roll (March 22nd), so that we can advertise there.

13) 7:23 New Business

Listen to this segment

i. Polina – Special Fees request actually needs to be $203,070.80 for Club Sports, $5000 increase since last week, $1000 more than vote earlier today. Club Sports forgot to include Tae Kwan Do in their line items.
10 for, 1 opposed, 1 abstaining. Passes

ii. GSC Retreat in South Lake, Tahoe, including eating, bowling, etc. Either weekend of March 6, or 13, including some variation of Thursday-Monday. Probably 3 days 2 nights. Melahn found a cabin that was finished in 2008, has 6 BR, sleeps 20, which costs $1300 to rent for the weekend, so if we can pick dates, he will look into whether that is still available.

We do usually have a spring retreat, though it’s often earlier in the quarter, but this will be a good chance to wrap up what we’ve done this year, as we prepare for the new GSC.

Melahn will send out an email as soon as the meeting adjourns, such that we can all check our calendars and get back to him about when works or doesn’t work, and then he will make plans.

iii. Melahn would like to be on GCC operations committee as well. Thought there were two spots on committee, there seems to be actually only one spot, though sometimes a second person would show up. Melahn uses the GCC a lot, would like the chance to have more direct communication with the administrators. Justin feels that the committee runs in a very particular style, feels it would not be conducive to that style to have Melahn attend. Melahn would like to receive the minutes from the meeting at least. Melahn would like to communicate desire to have more events in the GCC at that meeting, but Kristina doesn’t feel that’s the role of the meeting, which generally focuses on building use and maintenance, rather then activities. Instead, would recommend setting up a separate meeting with Ken or others instead, which could be more effective. Reminder that Justin goes to these meetings as a representative of the GSC, so we can bring concerns to him. The committee did approve putting up the requested stage lights.

Suggestion to table this discussion to next week’s agenda.

Meeting Adjourned 7:43

GSC Meeting 2008-02-20

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

Proceedings of the February 20th, 2008 meeting


Agenda

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Anwei!)

2) 6:00 Welcome with introductions (Kristina)
3) 6:05 Announcements (Kristina)
i. Please be aware that all meetings are recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approve minutes from the last meeting (2/13/07) with the following changes:
a. Add Matt McLaughlin to the attendance
b. Change that Michelle recruited people for formal from School of Ed, not Earth Sciences.
iii. Want GSC member to go to Student Leaders Working Lunch (part of Diversity Week) next Wednesday 2/27 from 11:30-1:30. Talk to Cullen if interested.

4) 6:10 Funding (Polina)
i. Undergraduate Product Design Student Association
ii. GSB Rugby Club
iii. Cultural Interactions Club

5) 6:20 Special Fees (Polina)

6) 7:00 Voting in new law rep (Kristina)

7) 7:05 ASSU Update (Mondaire)

8) 7:10 Programming update (Adam S. and Justin)

9) 7:15 Check-in about recruitment efforts (Kristina)

10) 7:25 New Business

Attendance

Voting members present:
At large 1: Maxim Afanasyev
At large 2: Hanna Muenke
At large 3: Kristina Keating
At large 5: Polina Segalova
Business: Rhyan Uy
Earth Sciences: Kyle Anderson (proxy Yinei Chen present)
Education: Michelle Brown
Engineering 1: Melahn Parker
Engineering 2: Zeng Fan (proxy Anwei Chai present)
Natural Sciences: Fen Zhao
Social Sciences: Euan Robertson

Voting members not present:
At large 4: Lan Wei
Law: Unfilled
Humanities: George Bloom
Medicine: Yana Hoy

Others in attendance: Alex Ene, Adam Beberg, Andrew Park, Adam Sciambi, Justin Brown, Jim Sinai, Nik deSceyes, Susana Montes, Matt McLaughlin, Matt Sprague, Danny Arbeiter, Chris Elmore, Matt McDonald, Kaanthi Kode, Maria Spletter

Minutes

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Anwei!)

2) 6:00 Welcome with introductions (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

We list favorite songs, though some people have trouble coming up with one.

3) 6:05 Announcements (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

i. Please be aware that all meetings are recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Minutes from the last meeting (2/13/08) were approved by consensus with the following changes:
a. Add Matt McLaughlin to the attendance
b. Change that Michelle recruited people for formal from School of Ed, not Earth Sciences.
iii. Want GSC member to go to Student Leaders Working Lunch (part of Diversity Week) next Wednesday 2/27 from 11:30-1:30. Talk to Cullen if interested. Euan volunteers to go.

4) 6:10 Funding (Polina)

Listen to this segment

i. GSB Rugby Club – 30 members come to practice regularly, have about 65 people on list total, many of whom come to games. Have two big tournaments each season, including travel needs, and also have some local matches. They come to the GSC today because they need money to run the lights they need to rent for the rugby pitch they’re using. The group is all grad students, and serves a different need from Club Sports rugby because that group practices much more frequently, and also even mixed Club Sports require that first-teams be just Undergrads. Despite the name, GSB Rugby Club is open to people from all schools, and is currently about 30% GSB people. This request for money should be temporary, because the Undergrad team bought lights, but didn’t have the money to turn them on. So, the current deal is that the Rugby Club is allowed to use the Undergrad pitch, which is nicer than other space, if they pay for rental lights for now. The future of this arrangement isn’t entirely clear, but the club does have a good relationship with the Undergrads, including a mentoring program. The club does have funding from GSB senate, which covers registration fees for tournaments, and also have some sponsorship. Current costs for running the lights (which are already on) are being paid out of pocket, but would like funding to cover the remainder of the year.
Requesting 4000, recommended 2500. Giving 2500 passes by consensus.

ii. Persian student association – Having a Winter gathering event, and expect about 125 students of their 200 members to attend. This event is about having a summary of the year so far, recognition of volunteers, and electing next year’s board. Recommended $1000. Giving $1000 passes by consensus.

5) 6:17 Voting in new law rep (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

Andrew Park is interested in filling in the role of Representative from the Law School, at least for now. Hasn’t heard about the elections process yet, so doesn’t know about what filling the role next year entails. Sees this as a chance to get involved, and connect the Law School with the rest of the University. The Law School is feeling that disconnect and is working to address it. For example, will switch to quarter system in 2009. Also have made a lot of dual degree programs. Andrew is currently a 1st year law student, though was already here for Undergrad and a Masters before. Having Andrew as the new representative from the Law School passes by consensus. We will swear him in next week.

6) 6:21 SSE Update (Matt)

Listen to this segment

Mondaire is not here, so we have an SSE update from Matt McLaughlin. As a follow-up last week on our question as to whether student fees could be reduced, he reports that we could change the allocation (prior to the elections) going to student group programming, our programming, etc, but that it would be difficult to lower the overall student fees for now, given that we would want it to be a temporary decrease only (and use some of the reserves to cover the overall budget, which would remain about the same either way).

SSE is looking more into babysitting thing. Issues like liability still remain, but are looking into it.

$32 per quarter is the current very rough estimate of grad fees for next year, based on amounts requested by groups, but as said, this is very rough, and will only go down. Was $29 per quarter this year.

7) 6:25 Programming update (Adam S. and Justin)

Listen to this segment

Formal is looking good! They did a walkthrough of the venue recently to finalize some details. Ticket sales are approaching 1000, and they will hopefully get a few more in the next couple of days. The venue will be open to us as of noon, and the party starts at 9pm, so will be doing some set-up during that time. They may want some helpers to get signs up and such. Much of the work will be done by the caterers, light people, etc. Melahn has volunteered to help clean-up at the end, Fen has volunteered to come set-up, but more people could be good though. Get in touch with Adam S and Justin if you would like to be useful.

8) 6:28 Check-in about recruitment efforts (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

We were all supposed to talk to two people about running for GSC next year. Listen to audio recording if you want specifics of what people accomplished. Not an easy task, but some potential interest. Melahn took some people out for lunch, which seemed successful. Challenge for older members whose main contacts are also older people who are also getting ready to graduate. Targeting younger students seems like a more effective strategy.

Discussion of how to make the running and voting process more clear. Suggestion to get screen shots of the voting process so that we can educate potential voters about the fact that people can vote for us within school and for an at-large seat. General suggestion to target people who are already student leaders to run for seats. Kristina thinks she has an email contact list for leaders of student groups that she could send an ad out to. Suggestion to have flyer that can be emailed around. Michelle suggests bullet point lists for potential candidates running, and for people voting, including basic steps and timelines.

9) 6:39 Special Fees (Polina)

Listen to this segment

Background – We are looking at Joint Special Fee groups tonight, who are seeking to be put on the ballot to potentially receive money from both Grad and Undergrad special fees. Keep in mind that we’re voting to put these Special Fee requests on the ballot, where they will still need to get 50% yes of the overall vote (of people who vote), with at least 15% of the entire student body (even those who don’t vote) voting yes. When we vote whether to put something on the ballot, it will need a 3/5 majority to pass. If it does not pass by 3/5, then the group can petition to get on the ballot, by getting signatures from 15% of the grad and undergrad student body. For groups who have received Special Fees before, and whose budgets have not increased more than 10%, if we vote yes, then it gets on the ballot. The Funding Committee has also looked into whether these groups have excess reserves. For groups requesting Special Fees money for the first time, or old groups with a more than 10% increase, if we vote yes, they still need to petition for 10% of grad and undergrad student body’s signatures before they get on the ballot. The GSC will have another vote closer to the elections (after the petitions process is complete), and those votes will be posted (overall – individuals not singled out) with each Special Fee request, as an indication of whether or not the GSC supports it. Currently though, we are just voting about whether to make it a little easier for groups to get on the ballot in the first place.

Every requested amount we see, divided by about 14,000 will be the cost per year for each student for that group.

The fact that groups will need to get particular numbers of petitioning and votes from grads and undergrads separately is something that we passed previously, though it hasn’t been ratified by the University yet. However, it should be before the election.

i. ASSU legal counsel – provides legal services to students. Estimated 70-30 split for grad/undergrad students who use their help. Can be useful for a variety of things, such as rental cases. Adam B. describes this as legal insurance for students, such that if something comes up, you have them, rather than having to hire an expensive lawyer. Recommended budget is $117,440.
Rhyan would like them to do more promotion to make themselves more well known to students, as their services aren’t useful if nobody knows about them. Others point out that it is in Grad Events each week. The Legal Counsel does keep track of how people who use them find out, and there is a variety, including the ads, their promotional items, word of mouth… Kristina feels like they do a good job promoting, and that they probably do better than other groups in terms of reaching graduate students. If what you need is beyond their services (for example, they won’t represent anyone in court), they can also refer to lawyers who work at a discount if necessary, though mostly provide counsel about how to do things on your own.

Vote: 8 for, 2 against, 1 abstaining. Passes by 3/5.

ii. Comedy Club –Thinking about having weekly Comedy Nights for grads, as is currently the case, then having some bigger name acts come which would probably have more of a draw for the Undergraduate students. Recommended budget of $27,4000.

Vote: 9 for, 0 opposed, 2 abstaining. Passes. Now need to petition to get on the ballot by getting signatures from 10% of grads and undergrads, since they are applying for Special Fees for the first time.

iii. Club sports – Requested $202,631, recommended $198,071. The Undergrads pick up a higher percentage of this tab, given that many Club Sports are heavily Undergrad, or don’t even allow Grad students on their first-teams. Question again about why Club Sports doesn’t fund groups like the GSB Rugby (that we saw earlier in the meeting). This is because they do fund a Rugby team already, and the GSB Rugby team meets a different need (is lower key, all grads, different types of competitions, grads wouldn’t be allowed to be on first-team anyway). Many club sports are very highly competitive, so people may not have the option to do so recreationally, which is why other options also exist.

Votes: 9 for, 1 opposed, 1 abstaining. Passes.

iv. KZSU radio station. Requesting $79,345, also recommendation. We don’t know numbers or listeners because a survey would be very expensive. Over half their DJs are grad students. Also, the station is used to send out Stanford alerts if necessary.

Vote: 9 for, 1 opposed, 1 abstaining. Passes

v. Pacific Free Clinic. Run by Med students or PreMeds. Asking $35,000, also recommended. This clinic serves the general community. Gives the Med Students a good chance to work with students, which they might not otherwise have. The clinic does have some other sources of funding, though their total budget is $52,700, so we do provide a substantial chunk. Michelle reports that this is a recruiting tool for Med students, that they will have more of an opportunity to work with patients than they might at other schools.

Vote: 8 for, 3 opposed, 0 abstaining. Passes.

vi. Student Organizing Committee for the Arts
Puts on various Arts events on Stanford campus throughout the year. Recommended $41,700. The money goes to such things as renting tents for outdoor events, putting together a CD of Stanford music each year, advertising, etc. Have big Art Affair event in spring.

Vote: 9 for, 0 against, 2 abstaining. Passes.

vii. Speaker’s Bureau. Asking $161,643, also recommended. This group brings big speakers to campus. This year bringing the author of Satanic Verses, Dave Berry (comedic writer), Morgan Spurloch (maker of Supersize Me), and have others under negotiation. They also co-sponsor with other groups with somewhat smaller events/budgets, and help with the finances and logistics, such as booking venues or otherwise organize this type of event. Total budgeted amount includes a transfer from Reserves that’s bundled in, which is why it seems big. The transfer leaves 10-15K left in reserve.

Vote: 10 for, 0 opposed, 1 abstaining. Passes.

viii. Sunday Flicks. Have had a lot of trouble recently running smoothly, including a number of weeks in the fall where they didn’t show any movies. Originally asked for an amount that was more than the 10% budget increase allowed without needing to petition, so have decided to cut out some low-attendance movie times, such as during finals, in order to bring their budget within a 10% change. Went through 6 directors in a year and a half, are now starting to pay people to encourage longer duration, which has been an unbudgeted expense. Had some old debt, continue to have some, but are working on it and have a plan for paying it off, so this shouldn’t be a major concern going forward. Alex feels that past mismanaged warrants not voting for them, as new money would go towards fixing the past mistakes, such as the existing debt. Polina reports that they’ve expanded their leadership, and seem more stable now. Flicks now has an oversight board, which is necessary as an SSE service project, which will also help with continuity. Now have interns and pipeline, as evidence for good structure and continuation in the future. This cost is evenly split between grads and undergrads, ends up costing $5 per year for each grad student.

Vote: 7 for, 0 opposed, 4 abstaining. Passes.

ix. Stanford Outdoors. Are requesting Umbrella group status for the collection of outdoor groups that exist on campus. Has been around for 2 years now, serving as an unofficial umbrella group for the smaller groups, reducing overlapping events, etc. Feels there are a number of outdoor groups that are replicating events, and not sufficiently addressing risk management, etc, and that they could improve this as a central organizing force. Requested $145,228, recommended $30,911.50. The first number was their “wish list” budget, including some equipment replacement, but they agreed that they could work within the smaller recommendation. A good chunk of that budget goes towards training, because trips require individuals trained in the appropriate first-aid, which is different for say, wilderness hiking and kayaking. Also, some of the existing gear is old, and rental is expensive, so they would like to replace that and reduce costs for use.

Across the outdoor groups that would be served by this umbrella, there are 3500 people on lists, 500 or so active people, and many more who go once or twice a year. These trips are good opportunities to get some time for reflection, and gain a different perspective from classes. Would like to increase people attending these opportunities. This year, went from 600 to 2000 unique visits to the rock climbing wall, which is good evidence that people are getting some experience with outdoors, and looking to get more. They have been advertising Stanford Outdoors at the rock climbing wall to draw on the budding interest of that crowd.

Club sports is currently the only umbrella organization on Grad side. Need to decide whether to grant that status to Stanford Outdoors as well. Being an umbrella group means that we would give them a specified budget, and they then organize subgroups, and they distribute money to those subgroups, rather than those groups asking the GSC individually. By granting umbrella status, we give them a lot of authority. There is some evidence that they are reasonably prepared for that. Stanford Outdoors works with the coordinator of outdoor education, who is full time university staff, and have more of his time than club sports has of their staff member. Have a number of storage locations around campus that are secured, etc, allowing them to grow. Some of the sub-groups already have successfully run equipment rental programs for awhile, so although the overall Stanford Outdoors group is somewhat new, the subgroups have also demonstrated their responsibility. Not asking for money for climbing wall, which University has supported.

Currently, each club has own financial officers, who come to Stanford Outdoors meetings. There are currently 9 subgroups, with 600 total members, which is about half grad students. Chris points out that these trips are not just about outdoor fun, but have a strong education component as well.

Umbrella status implies more money, and also creates mandate for more outreach. Improves the cohesion of outdoor groups, for example, and would hopefully lead to a better system of sharing supplies. Many groups have high dues already, perhaps discouraging potentially interested people from joining, and umbrella status (increasing sharing, along with potential special fees money) would hopefully reduce this burden. Alex feels that having this organized umbrella organization would encourage growth.

Hanna asks about why Umbrella is more expensive than just giving what we would to the groups individually. This would be about $15,000 total for the grad fee, which is more than we’ve given to the subgroups so far, though theoretically, the groups could still ask us for more (we haven’t seen all the groups this year). Many groups are capital equipment intensive, more so than other sports, which GSC money would not be able to help with. Money difference we’re talking about is $10,000 if groups come request money under the general fee guidelines, or about $15,000 with the special fee application that the umbrella organization has submitted, if it is approved. It’s more about whether the group is ready to control the money, or whether the GSC would want to continue seeing the groups.

It’s potentially costly for groups to disband from the umbrella, given funding rules in place, but the groups have put a lot of work into preparing an overall budget, and are interested in being part of a cohesive umbrella unit.

Polina thinks that creating an umbrella organization would be good, because that reduces duplication of effort that’s currently happening. Adam thinks that the umbrella organization would be good, but potentially better to wait for a year for us to see more about what they’re up to, given that Stanford Outdoors as an overseeing group is fairly new. If we do approve the Umbrella, the group will still need 15% of both bodies to get onto the ballot with their proposed budget, and then 50% of voters plus 15% of total voters, so there are still plenty of hurdles.

If we don’t vote to approve umbrella, then each group comes to the GSC individually, or unofficially gets put to Outdoor club to organize financial requests.

2/3 role call to create umbrella group

Vote: 10 for, 0 opposed, 0 abstaining. Passes.

x. Reapprove Club Sports as umbrella group. Put this in now while we are fully aware of the meaning of umbrella groups. We need to vote each year to approve again each existing umbrella group. There is minimal discussion on this point, with general agreement that Club Sports is working well as an umbrella group.

Vote: 9 for, 0 opposed, 1 abstaining. Passes.

xi. Outdoor Club Special Fees request. Now talking about the special fee budget requested by the newly created Outdoor club umbrella group. Requested $145,228, recommended $30,911. See also the previous discussion about the creation of umbrella group for the difference between requested and recommended. Agreed with undergrads that 31,000 was a reasonable goal, especially for a new group, because that makes them more likely to get sufficient yes votes on the ballot (because some money is better than the no money they would get without sufficient support). Equipment and food and gas costs are what got cut from the original budget. The subgroups last year got about 12K collectively last year, so this is more. Because of the lower budget, will probably meet their costs by asking people going on trips for gas and food moneyor having “strongly recommended” dues, which is what Club Sports does.

Vote: 8 for, 0 opposed, 1 abstaining. Passes.

10) 8:01 New Business

No new business, adjourned.

GSC Meeting 2008-02-13

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008

Proceedings of the February 13, 2008 GSC meeting


Agenda

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Anwei!)

2) 6:00 Welcome with introductions (Kristina)

3) 6:05 Announcements (Kristina)
i. Please be aware that all meetings are recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approve minutes from the last meeting (2/6/07).
iii. Need someone to help with Grad night at Flicks, this Sunday 2/17 at 6:30pm.

4) 6:10 Funding (Polina)
i. Polish Club at Stanford
ii. French Stanford Student Association
iii. Persian Student Association

5) 6:20 Budget Update (Euan)

6) 6:30 Request for food money (Euan)

7) 6:35 ASSU Update (Mondaire)

8) 6:40 Programming update (Adam S. and Justin)

9) 6:45 Stanford Alumni Mentoring Program (Stephanie)

10) 7:05 GSC promotional items (Kristina)

11) 7:20 Brainstorming for elections recruitment (Kristina)

12) 7:35 New Business

Attendance

Voting members present:
At large 1: Maxim Afanasyev
At large 2: Hanna Muenke
At large 3: Kristina Keating
At large 4: Lan Wei
At large 5: Polina Segalova
Business: Rhyan Uy
Earth Sciences: Kyle Anderson
Education: Michelle Brown
Engineering 1: Melahn Parker
Engineering 2: Zeng Fan
Medicine: Yana Hoy
Natural Sciences: Fen Zhao
Social Sciences: Euan Robertson

Voting members not present:
Law: Unfilled
Humanities: George Bloom

Others in attendance: Justin Brown, Adam Beberg, Andrew Park, Susana Montes-Delgado, Maria Spletter, Khanthi Kode, Alex Ene, Yan Yan, Donna Winston, Adam Sciambi, Matt Turk, Matt McLaughlin

Minutes

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Anwei!)

2) 6:02 Welcome with introductions (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

We add which school we’re in.

3) 6:04 Announcements (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

i. Please be aware that all meetings are recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approved minutes from the last meeting (2/6/08) by consensus.
iii. Need someone to help manning the table at Grad night at Flicks, this Sunday 2/17 at 6:30pm. Maria and Michelle volunteer.

4) 6:06 Funding (Polina)

Listen to this segment

i. Persian Student Association – saw them already for this event, namely a night with Firoozeh Dumas, a best selling author. Had previously asked for money, but would like to expand the event. They were planning on using the Havana room, which was free, but would now like to use Cubberley, which has $300 in rental fee. Also asking for $50 for advertising. Have asked some other sources for money as well. Recommended $350. Giving $350 passes by consensus.

ii. French Stanford Student Association
- Mardi-Gras celebration, serving crepes, expect about 60 students. Will be held in Timoshenko
- Goodbye barbecue.
Total recommended is $800. Giving passes by consensus.

iii. Polish Club at Stanford. They’re a new group on campus.
-Planning BBQ on March 1st at I-Center. Will serve Polish cuisine and drinks. Should be a good chance to recruit new members and socialize. Have also applied for funds from I-Center. Recommended $300. Giving $300 passes by consensus.

5) 6:10 Budget Update (Euan)

Listen to this segment

Discussing the part of the budget that we have control over. Most of the time we’ve underspent.
For Retreats and Training, we have $6000 total for the year, and have $3671 left currently. We will have both a transition/training day and a retreat for the new GSC, which will use some of that.
General discretionary is for anything that we want to spend money on that’s not specifically in the budget, other than programming. Have $4620 left out of $5000. Marketing has $3000 total, which we haven’t spent any of yet. Should spend lots on election. This will go towards bottle openers and post-its as promotional items, which we will talk about later.
Advocacy has $1907 left, out of $4000 total.
For constituency outreach we have $1500 ($100 each for elected members) and haven’t spent any of that yet.
Meeting food had $9000 total, $2692 left. Probably need 1500 more till end of fiscal year. Euan will propose to cover this by moving money from general discretionary.

Overall picture, not spending as much money as we have budgeted.

Donna suggests having a big retreat with new group for training/transition, rather than in the fall. The training day that we do is not so exciting, so it might be more fun for new members to have a retreat. Apparently in the past, it was that way. It’s challenging to organize for that many people though (as then the retreat would have all the old and new members.

Rhyan wonders why, given that we seem to have excess, why we don’t lower student fees. Euan’s response is that it’s hard to raise the fees afterwards, so we should perhaps just not make the increase inflation.

Maria points out that the budget we’re discussing actually has nothing to do with student fees – it’s what we get from ASSU as operating budget.

There’s lots of money for outreach! Maria encourages using it. In the past, has been used for things like pizza events (Even just sponsoring a department’s typical night out). Often those events have good turnout, so it’s a good way to get our name out there. Suggestion to bring this discussion up again later, since we did have specific time set aside later.

6) 6:22 Request for food money (Euan)

Listen to this segment

Euan requesting that we move $1500 from general discretionary to meeting food money. We want to encourage people to come to meetings, don’t want them to starve while they’re around. Alex wonders whether that will be enough money for food when we have the overlap between old and new members which will mean more people coming to meetings. However, $1500 is probably more than we actually need, so it should be fine.

7) 6:24 ASSU Update (Mondaire)

Listen to this segment

Mondaire not here. Matt reports that they met with Andy and Teresa in GLO to talk about babysitting idea. Nothing in particular that’s new.

8) 6:25 Programming update (Adam S. and Justin)

Listen to this segment

Things are going well. Tickets are moving well so far. Michelle has recruited lots of School of Ed people. Will have two dance floors again, including formal dance. Yay!

9) 6:26 GSC promotional items (Kristina).

Listen to this segment

We talked awhile ago about getting bottle openers and other small things as promotional items. Have in the past ordered 1000 of each item, through the SSE special products, which is enough to get bulk discounts. Items will have GSC logo and website to help get our name out there. We currently have nothing left of small items, so definitely need to order more.
Stanford Store has keychain wallets that would be a good larger item to purchase when we’re next low on them. Would like to increase volunteer base, which the larger items would be good for as prize/thank you, perhaps in a lottery fashion after volunteering at a couple of events.
Proposing to order 1000 pads of post-its at 1.01 each, and 1000 bottle openers at 1.000, so $2010 total. Approving this order passes by consensus.

10) 6:30 Brainstorming for elections recruitment (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

Ideas are to:
– sponsor events that go on in schools anyway.
- prizes for voting
- prizes for getting elected (we don’t think Euan was serious).
- co-sponsoring larger prior events.

Try to focus on getting people to run for elections, not just getting our name out there.
- try to specifically target first-year students (get email list of those in our department)
- invite specific people (give each GSC member a couple of nice invites to give out)
- ask CAs about active people in their areas
- approach those who applied to be CAs but didn’t get it.
- ask Jake to tell NomCom applicants that they can be involved with GSC.
- Current NomCom individuals will also be done with their term, so maybe they’ll be free to join GSC.
- Facebook advertising.
- take target individuals out for coffee or something
- ask student group leaders

For next week, everyone should use these strategies to try and get two people informed about the GSC and potentially interested in . Will report back on that next week.

11) 6:39 Stanford Alumni Mentoring Program (Stephanie Ebele and Marlene Stern)

Listen to this segment

Stephanie and Marlene from Career Development Center. Have Stanford Alumni Mentoring program in place for Undergrads and want to talk to us about the possibility of expanding it or creating something new for graduate students. Goal today is to show us the existing program, get feedback from us about how it might work for graduate students, get a sense for whether there would be interest among grad alums for an alumni mentoring program.

Not talking about academic mentoring, as the goal would be that advisors fulfill that need. Goal to connect us with an alumni who can offer some career guidance and advice about life after Stanford. Mentoring is about a relationship, not a specific job opportunity, and the program supports that relationship building.

Stanford Alumni Mentoring (SAM) is a registered student group, with CDC counseling staff as advisor. Marlene has been filling that role. The program is available to Undergrads and Co-Terms only, as of now. A pilot was launched in spring ’06 which started with 25 students and 90 alumni, and has grown since then. Fall ’07 had 130 students and 540 alumni. Will have another advertised push for applications soon. Overall has been a positive experience for mentors and mentee.

Website is at mentoring.stanford.edu

Process is that students can apply twice a year, then participate in mandatory orientation, and then get a log-in so that they can enter the program and search for a mentor

In the search for a mentor, can select different criteria (such as degree obtained) and also say how important that feature is to you. Done intentionally so that you don’t know name or title of the mentor, but rather just see the profile, with education background, field of study, general information. Everything remains anonymous until the match is made and both have agreed to the match based on the profile. Only then are names provided, allowing the two to get in touch.

This program is not directly aimed at academic mentoring, though there are probably academics on there, though can’t do a direct search for that. It was designed for undergrads, perhaps why it’s missing things like that, so that’s why our feedback helps as the program thinks about evolving to also match graduate students.

Michelle asks about how the program might be different if opened to graduate students. For grad students looking for a career, it would probably work pretty well as it is, though they could make a greater push for more mentors with higher degrees, who would be more likely to be in similar careers that graduate students might consider.

Polina asks about whether the success of the mentoring relationships are checked in on after the match is made. The program is set-up with only a formal six months of match, though people could separately continue relationship afterwards. After six months students could look for another match. While there isn’t anything to prevent students from continuing the formed relationship, the system is designed to make the match, rather than necessarily maintain it.

Adam B. thinks it’s pretty good for Masters students, but may need to do more recruiting of Masters and PhD level alumni to match with current grad students who want to go into industry. And of course, it is an entirely different issue for PhDs looking to go into academia, which has not been the focus of recruiting for alumni who could mentor for that type of decision. Original goal was to have a system with a 1 student to 4 alumni ratio, such that students have a better chance of finding a mentor with a good fit. Many of the alumni take more than one student, or would at least be willing to. Have about 130 students apply each session, and are looking more for anything that would need to screen people out, rather than let them in. Only rejected 1 previously, because it didn’t seem like that student would follow through on the commitment.

GSC members agree that there’s a need for mentoring. Maria points out that particular groups, such as women in science and engineering, may have particularly strong desire for mentoring relationship.

Would definitely want people who struggled with decision to leave academia (perhaps intending to get PhD but left with Masters) – how do they do afterwards?

Marlene points out that Stanford Career Network is another option, particularly for alumni looking for a fellow alumni mentor. Stems from Alex’s question about whether people could sign up as both mentor and mentee, which the current set-up doesn’t allow for.

Discussion about potential changes to the system. Rhyan suggests option to search by location, since if students know they want to be somewhere else after graduation, it might be helpful to know people there. The system does allow this. Alex asks about age, and there is a proxy in the system of years out. System also allows search by degree in a particular field of study. Discussion about ability to select requested gender or sexual orientation, which could be a valuable resource for students looking for help with particular issues. Students are not asked to fill out these questions, and alumni could also choose not to answer if they’re not comfortable.

There’s at least minor screening for student applicants, but not so much for alumni. However, students can report if alumni are not being responsive, in which case the office can try to get in touch with the alumni.

Search only returns five per page, no ability to scroll through multiple results beyond that, so some people may get left out. Recognize that there’s some programming updates needed for the site. Site does have the functionality for mentors to list multiple degree areas, etc, which makes them more likely to show up on a search. Also, person doing the search is likely to try their search in many ways, which makes it more likely that the search will turn up useful people.

SAM would like more graduate students to be involved both as a focus group, or as a volunteer in the group. SAM doesn’t have funding, which makes this hard.

Though there are similarities to Facebook, LinkedIn, and other social networking sites, but is more controlled, which perhaps makes it easier and more comfortable to get started, and contact people.

Potential money needs: upgrades (one time cost), and staff person who maintains connections, runs orientations, etc.

They pass around a sheet asking for interested GSC members to sign up. Will get in touch with the volunteers soon, and will potentially have a pilot group of grad students in the spring session for SAM.

Suggestion for us to keep on Provost’s office that we think this tool has potential for graduate students.

So far funding has come from 5 years ago with a start up from alumni group, CDC, and vice provost of student affairs. Has run on a budget of about $12,000. There’s no ongoing budget, and has been made functional with time that the CDC people take away from their other duties, and students volunteers.

12) 7:29 New Business

Listen to this segment

i. Bulletin about to go out, send stuff to Yana if you want it go to in, such as advocacy news, etc.

7:30 Meeting adjourned.

GSC Meeting 2008-02-06

Wednesday, February 6th, 2008

Proceedings of the February 6th, 2008 meeting


Agenda

***************************************************************
GSC Agenda: February 6, 2008, 6:00-8:00pm – FOOD @ 5:45!
Graduate Community Center – Nairobi Room
***************************************************************

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Anwei!)

2) 6:04 Welcome with introductions (Kristina)

3) 6:05 Announcements (Kristina)
i. Please be aware that all meetings are recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approve minutes from the last meeting (1/30/07).

4) 6:06 Funding (Polina)

5) 6:20 ASSU Update (Mondaire)

6) 6:25 Programming update (Adam S. and Justin)

7) 6:30 Grad night at Flicks (Hanna)

8) 6:35 EV Families Update (Hanna)

9) 6:40 Introduction to the Committee on Research (Kristina)

10) 7:00 New Business

Attendance

Voting members present:
At large 1: Maxim Afanasyev
At large 2: Hanna Muenke
At large 3: Kristina Keating
At large 5: Polina Segalova
Business: Rhyan Uy
Earth Sciences: Kyle Anderson
Engineering 1: Melahn Parker
Engineering 2: Zeng Fan (proxy Justin Brown present)
Education: Michelle Brown (proxy Laura McCloskey present)
Humanities: George Bloom
Natural Sciences: Fen Zhao
Social Sciences: Euan Robertson

Voting members not present:
Law: Unfilled
At large 4: Lan Wei
Medicine: Yana Hoy

Others in attendance: Maria Spletter, Alex Ene, Adam Beberg, Susana Montes, Matt McDonald, Matt McLaughlin, Cullen Buie, Donna Winston

Minutes

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Anwei!)

2) 6:04 Welcome with introductions (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

3) 6:05 Announcements (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

i. Please be aware that all meetings are recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approved minutes from the last meeting (1/30/07) by consensus.

4) 6:06 Funding (Polina)

Listen to this segment

i. Stanford law and policy review group.
Having a Law school conference on Feb 23. Having 15 guests, including a congressman, lobbyists from Washington and members of watch dog groups. Have the overall goal to talk about how lobbying should be reformed. Expects event to appeal to a cross section of grad students. Will have a panel about lobbying in pharmaceuticals, which could appeal to bio/med students and one panelist will be a professor from UCLA who studies lobbying from the business perspective, so that could appeal to GSB.
Had requested a lot of honorarium (not so much payment as covering travel costs, but within our definition of honorarium), but we have a cap of $750 per event for honorarium. Also requested a lot for food, but recommending only $600, based on expected graduate student turnout. Group is trying to raise funds from other sources, depending on how that goes, may need to cut back on food. Tried to get money from law firms, but they don’t seem to want to be associated with lobbying. Will probably try to cut down on food costs, because honorarium can’t be changed, given that speakers have booked flights and such. There is a suggestion to work with ASSU speaker’s bureau to potentially get more money, or charge fees for attendees. Are looking into whether they can get the event approved as a training opportunity, which lawyers need to have a certain number of hours for each year. If so, that would make it easier to charge lawyers to attend the event. Recommendation to also get in touch with BioMass for participant recruitment. Requested $14300, committee recommended $1500. Giving $1500 passes by consensus.

ii. Discussion of money spent this year.
Have spent $108,000 on groups so far, which is on target for the year. Could probably be spending a little more, but there will likely be higher requests in the spring for end of year parties.

5) 6:16 ASSU Update (Mondaire) – not here

6) 6:17 Programming update (Adam S. and Justin)

Listen to this segment

Formal on February 23rd, buy tickets! Put flyers up, if you don’t have any, get some. Particularly need people who live in EV studios and EV highrise buildings and Lyman to do some flyering, because you need a key to get in to those buildings. Thanks to people who flyered campus today.

7) 6:17 Grad night at Flicks (Hanna)

Listen to this segment

Time for another grad night at Flicks! It seems like they’re organized enough this quarter to have regular movies, so Grad night is a go! We’ll do two events this quarter, since a) they’re not that expensive, and b) we didn’t do one last quarter, so we definitely have money. We will go to the 7pm show, and serve donuts and juice, most likely. Discussion that family friendly movies tend to get a larger audience, and reminder that that is a good way to serve our entire constituency. Flicks is showing the following movies over the rest of this quarter. Names followed by votes gotten (everyone voted twice).
Feb 17 Enchanted 11
Feb 24 Rendition 1
March 2 Golden Compass 5
March 9 I am Legend 2
March 16 Sweeney Todd 6

Based on votes, we will hold grad night for Enchanted and Sweeney Todd.

8) 6:22 EV Families Update (Hanna)

Listen to this segment

Hanna reports on her visit to the EV Family CAs meeting. They had the following comments about their concerns.
- would like list of undergrads that are interested in babysitting
- need repair of walkways and lights around EV
- would like us to support CAs as a voice to university
- suggest stand up projector as an equipment purchase
- structures in the courtyards are being removed and not replaced.

GSC comments: SSE is looking into whether they could make a business of centralizing babysitting services. Matt will talk to GLO about that, and also Matt Anders, who was a GSC member working on grad student family concerns. For it to be a business, there would need to be at least minimal profit, but if cost is spread among many families and everything is more centralized, it doesn’t necessarily need to cost much. Sororities apparently get emails about babysitting for faculty kids, and there are apparently some ads in the EV main office, but all seems piecemeal. Suggestion to consider a 2 tiered system where faculty pay more.

Walkway thing is more a housing issue than us, so we’re not pursuing this at this time.

Screen idea probably a no-go, given that they’re expensive, and we think that often a wall could be substituted.

9) 6:30 Registrars committee update

Listen to this segment

Justin takes back his comment that the committee just sits around and drinks juice. They’re currently working on fixing Axess to make it more student friendly. Peoplesoft folk run Axess, so some limitations are hardwired to their programming (like how you can’t use the back button while using Axess, and general running speed), but are making efforts to make the interface cleaner, with an emphasis on clarity for the most common tasks.

Kristina got an email from a student who was applying for a visa, and was having a hard time getting a letter from the registrar saying that he was making degree progress sufficiently and would graduate by a particular date. Registrar reported that they couldn’t do this, though Kristina feels that should be part of their role. Justin will ask the committee about this.

10) New Business Pt. 1

Listen to this segment

i. Polina needs more people for funding committee. Only two others have been coming to meetings regularly, and one who was asked about taking the role of Committee chair for next year said only maybe, most likely because of the time commitment.

May need to post externally to get this position filled, there’s at least some pay for it, though perhaps more a token than true compensation. Would want them to have familiarity with GSC, so perhaps advertise for new deputy chair, and give them some more responsibilities. Special Fees comes up soon, and it would be good for the person to be involved with that, to see how it goes before taking primary responsibility next year. Polina will be here through the summer at least, but still need training time for the new person.

There is a lot of commitment to the position – want them to be involved for two years (being trained one year, training the next person the year after), and the weekly commitment is also high (3 hours of meetings, but then dealing with emails, equipment issues, etc add a lot to that). Suggestion to have a deputy chair with more responsibility to lighten the load of the committee chair.

GCC is supposed to be dealing with equipment, but need to have a filter between requests that come in, and which ones go the GCC to get filled.

Justin/Adam could work with equipment rental problems (because they’ll tone down programming after formal), and Fen could start approving equipment rental (as Grad events coordinator, she has a sense for what events are legitimate).

Request for job description for Polina’s job and deputy chair job, such that it could go out on grad announce.

ii. Cullen giving update on Diversity Committee.

Listen to this segment

Cullen had been an elected GSC member, now trying to graduate, but still chair of the diversity committee. Working with ASSU execs to create a weeklong diversity focused programming. Will have focus for grads and undergrads.
Day 1 – Monday Feb 25th at noon, discussion on faculty diversity and lunch with the Associate VP of Faculty Development, at Tressider Oak Room.
Day 2 – Tuesday Feb 26th at 6pm Graduate Diversity discussion with VPGE at GCC Havana room, dinner provided. Similar in content to VPGE’s presentation to GSC in fall quarter.
Day 3 – Wednesday Feb 27th at 11:30am – working meeting with student leaders who are interested in diversity. Come up with suggestions and recommendations for the University, going beyond perhaps the ideas from previous days, and giving feedback and ideas for implementation.
2/29-3/2 – Graduate Recruitment and Diversity Day (G-RADD) – students who have been accepted to Graduate programs at Stanford, and who add diversity to the community, are invited to campus. During this week, people will write some op-eds to Daily talking about importance of diversity in sciences, and some other topics, with the goal of creating lots of examples of positive diversity. Will have wristbands saying “Excellence is Inclusive” to be passed out at events, possibly White Plaza.
Monday March 4 at 6pm – presentation of student ideas/suggestions from the 27th. Chance for the ideas that the student leaders came up earlier in the week to be presented.

Asking GSC, VPGE and ASSU Exec for funding for different aspects of the week’s events. VPGE funding (250 for food at graduate student talk) is secured, requesting $975 from ASSU Exec, and asking GSC for $550 (primarily for wristbands, printing). This is an advocacy issue, so there is a separate line item in the budget, which still has sufficient funds to cover this. Giving $550 passes by consensus.

11) 6:52 Introduction to the Committee on Research (Kristina)

Listen to this segment

Been trying to get students on University Committees to come in and talk to us, so that we can be updated on what’s going on. Today we have Jonathan from the Committee on Research. In general, the committee focuses on issues of policy, funding, anything that impacts research.

Have worked on two projects primarily so far:
First, is a case where a professor in Mechanical Engineering got a 105 million dollars grant from Army over 5 years, potentially extended. When it was announced last spring, 80-100 faculty signed a form saying it was an improper grant. They felt this because it’s limited who can work on the grant (such as being citizens, etc). The committee has spent the quarter going through the grant proposal (1000s of pages) and have been discussing what issues may play a role in the grant being appropriate or not. The Office of Sponsored Research generally handles these grants, and must filter grants before the university accepts them, checking for stipulations like secret research that would make it ineligible. This grant had already cleared that process. The Committee will be presenting in April to the University Senate, and are planning to tell them that the grant seems appropriate to accept. Also will make clear that it should be a one time thing that they looked at this grant because the faculty objected, but that in general, OSR exists for a reason and that their process is sufficient to determine the acceptability of grants. Also, feel that faculty shouldn’t really be involved in each other’s grants.

Second issue is overhead costs that get taken out of grants. All grants have 58% overhead taken out by University, which goes to lighting, buildings, administrative, etc. Used to be capped at 26% that was allowed to be used, but many are now over this. In past fiscal year in congress a bill was proposed to cap overhead costs at 35%, which would affect DOE funding. Not sure if this bill is going to go through, if so, Stanford potentially concerned about where administrative costs would come from. No decisions or resolutions yet on that issue. When money is collected from this overhead, seems to mostly goes into one big pot, rather than specific percentages being designated to particular items, so discussions about how to distribute that also necessary. Other top universities seem to be similar in overhead cost, if not a little higher, so not just us.

Jonathan feels like he’s been able to contribute the grad student voice in issues of funding and support for graduate students on the committee.

Don’t seem to be too many secret grants that the University deals with (where government takes info, authors not allowed to publish, which might particularly be a problem for graduate students working on dissertations). Dual use concept, where if there’s some civilian use, then it’s okay to write about.

Question about the difference between “gifts” and “grants” to University, whether “gifts” have this overhead taken out. Jonathon wasn’t sure, though thought so, but Maxim from personal experience says that gifts do not have overhead taken out.

Office (OSR) should also be working on graduate student grants, as they do officially go through them, but Maria has found that they aren’t so helpful in terms of managing them, letting students know when renewals are due, etc. Has been a concern for her, quite possibly for other students as well. Couldn’t even find her name in the grant administrative system. Wants Committee to investigate the management of graduate student grants, both in theory and in practice.

Jonathan’s thoughts on the Committee nomination process are that there was a clear website application, with short essays, interviews after that, and informed a couple weeks later of committee assignment. Learned about it from emails. Have reporting system for committee student members, that others such as GSC should be able to see, though seems to be some technical difficulties in getting these reports.

12) New business, Pt 2.

Listen to this segment

1) ASSU elections are coming up, and we need to get more people around the table doing things. Of our currently elected members, many will not be around next year, or are not planning on running again, so definitely need some new people! Euan asks about the timing of Polina’s position, and wonders if changing it would make it any more likely that a current member might take it, since it would then not conflict with current positions. However, the fiscal year is different than the rest of what we do, and special fees would be good thing for them to be in, which are coming up now, so we really should do a targeted search for a Funding Chair or Deputy Chair, rather than just waiting until elections and then hoping one of those new people would be interested.

Adjourned 7:17.