Posts Tagged ‘Minutes’

GSC meeting 2008-11-19

Wednesday, November 19th, 2008

Proceedings of the November 19th, 2008 GSC meeting


Agenda

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Shane!)

2) 6:00 Introductions and Announcements (George)
i. Please be aware that all meetings are audio recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approve minutes from the last meeting (11/12/08)

3) 6:05 Funding (Addy)
i. Russian Student Association
ii. Comedy Club

4) 6:15 Proposal to allocate more money for co-sponsorship (Addy)

5) 6:20 ASSU Update (Jonny/Fagan)

6) 6:25 Elections Committee Update (Etosha)

7) 6:30 Public Safety (Chief Laura Wilson)

8) 6:50 Undergrad Senate Update (Justin/Ryan/Shelley)

9) 6:55 Programming (Justin/Adam S.)

10) 7:00 Faculty Senate Update (Adam B.)

11) 7:05 Funding Request ($400) for Grad Diversity Leaders Dinner (Justin)

12) 7:10 New Business (George)

Attendance

Voting members present:
At large 1: Aleksandra Korolova
At large 2: Adam Beberg
At large 3: Nanna Notthoff
At large 4: Ryan Peacock
At large 5: Mary Van der Hoven
Earth Sciences: Justin Brown
Education: Shane Moise
Engineering 1: Polina Segalova
Engineering 2: Addy Satija (proxy Andrew Danowitz present)
Humanities: George Bloom
Law: Andrew Park
Medicine: Sean Young (proxy Maria Spletter present)
Social Sciences: Hanna Muenke

Voting members not present:
Business: Rick Thielke
Natural Sciences: Fen Zhao

Other people present: Ping Li (Funding Committee), Melahn Parker (Comedy Club), Sohan Dharmaroya (Comedy Club), Simone Manganelli, Matt McLaughlin, Daisy Chen (Daily), Daniel Change, Matt Turk, Alex Naxlobin (Russian Student Association), Adam Sciambi, Irene Chu, David Gobaud, Alex Ene, Etosha Cave, Lan Wei (Funding Committee)

Minutes

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Shane!)

2) 6:06 Introductions and Announcements (George)

Listen to this segment

i. Please be aware that all meetings are audio recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approved minutes from the last meeting (11/12/08) by consensus.

3) 6:10 Funding (Lan)

Listen to this segment

i. Russian Student Association – Requesting money for two events. First is a Dec 6 welcome back party with $550 requested for that. Second event is Orthodox New Year on 19th of January, with $600 requested. For one other event they wanted to do, they missed the deadline for advertising, so could not get funding for that. Total recommended is $1150. Giving $1150 passes by consensus.

ii. Comedy Club – Two applications. First for three events in winter quarter. BGSA, Stanford Indian Students and Muslim Students Awareness Network would like to work with Comedy Club to put on co-sponsored events. First two in early February. Are also getting money from Undergrads and Speakers Bureau. Each event will be a comedy show, with comics potentially reflecting some of the experiences and cultures of those groups. Comedy Club has already hit their group limit, so this money would come from co-sponsorship. $3250 is currently left in that account. Each show costs about $1000, asking us for half of the total amount, $1500. Have one comic in mind already, think they could get other good ones as well. Plan to rent out a larger space on campus that can hold a larger crowd than the 750. All the groups are predominantly grad students, so this should be reflected in attendance at the event. Giving $1500 passes by consensus.

Also requesting $3000 from us for a big event, which would come from the Big Event fund. Plan to have it Dec 5th at Kresge, which can hold 600 people. Expecting $6000 cost total. It will be a similar Hypnotist/Comedy Show as they’ve held in the past. Last time, they got good attendance in MemAud.

Reminder of how our funding works.

About $95K from GSGF, we added $50K from our reserves to that, for $145K total for funding for events. $135K is for VSOs (with line-item caps and $8000 limit), $10K for co-sponsorship (VSOs working together). We later approved $10K from the reserves for big events.

Matt McLaughlin thinks we should overdraw co-sponsorship if anything, so money could come from anything left out of the $135K at the end of the year, rather than taking from reserves directly.

Adam B. thinks that Comedy Club is requesting too much money overall (hit their $8000 cap, now requesting $1500 for co-sponsored events and $3000 for big event for $12500 total), and that although they fall within the guidelines for co-sponsorship and Big Event, it’s still a lot of money overall which is then not going to other student groups. Some others agree.

Ryan thinks we should have a discussion about what we would like to do with co-sponsorship before we overdraw it. For example, perhaps agreeing ahead of time on a higher firm limit, rather than just agreeing that $10,000 may be too low.

Alex would like to see us be more clear how we treat requests from other VSOs with overlapping populations (given the goal of using the money to reach as many students as possible), for example, Chinese Students overall, and Chinese Women’s collective.

Adam B. says they used to have a cap of $30 per student actually in the group (not just on the mailing list), but we’ve used different systems lately, perhaps not working terrifically either.

George reminds us that the point of co-sponsorships is to get more and different students involved.

Representative of Comedy Club thinks that this is a good chance to get new students involved, for example, some of the students in those cultural groups might not feel comfortable in bar scene (where weekly comedy nights are held), so it’s nice to give them a chance to attend a show in a different setting.

Nanna asks what else they have considered for funding, especially since they do have this trouble every year with wanting to put on more events than their caps allow. For the Big Event, Speakers Bureau is giving $1000, Execs giving $1000-$1500, and Undergrads are giving $1000.

Polina thinks we should table this discussion about the request in particular in order to come up with clearer expectations about how each of the pools of money should be distributed in general.

However, the event is coming up soon, and there’s no meeting over Thanksgiving, so they cannot wait for us to have a separate discussion.

Matt reports that we have about 60K left for the remainder of the year, having already allocated more than half of our budget in the first quarter alone.

Melahn says that this Comedy Show/Hypnotist was a successful event in the past, and was then seen as a good chance to get away from the weekly events. Requests that we consider $2000 instead of $3000, and they could ask the other sources for more money.

Objections to giving $2000 from Big Event fund, so move to roll-call vote.

5 for, 7 opposed, 1 abstaining. Fails.

4) 6:37 Proposal to allocate more money for co-sponsorship (Lan)
Tabling this.

5) 6:37 Public Safety (Chief Laura Wilson)

Listen to this segment

Sent out the latest safety report in October via email to all students, and now has paper copies of it for us.

Chief Wilson is a 1991 Stanford alum, Human Biology Major. Stayed in Police Work because she likes managing big events, liked the chance to do training and impact how the police interact with students.

Some of the units: Patrols, Traffic/Parking (can’t arrest, but can cite), Event management (ranging from our parties to visiting dignitaries, about 400 per year).

One thing they’re working on is reaching out to International Students, who may not understand the policies of the US or are afraid of approaching the police.

The police put on workshops for groups, which include Identity Theft, Gun removal, and Safety techniques. A group can get in touch with them to request these.

Winter quarter offer Police Academy, meets 1 night a week, get some experience about parts of the police job, like driving the car, responding to threats, etc.

Polina asks about the sexual assault numbers, which have increased over time. Polina wonders whether this is due to underreporting or actual increasing. Chief Wilson thinks that the increase is more about reporting. Polina asks about Grad/Undergrad split for the documented instances. Chief Wilson thinks it’s 70% undergrad, 30% grads, with instances reported by undergrads more likely to be fueled by alcohol and those reported by grads more about relationships.

David asks about 5-SURE and it’s role. Chief Wilson not sure how much it decreases incidences of sexual assault, given that many assaults occur between two people who know each other.

At their recent meeting, the Undergrad Senate discussed use of 5-SURE, wondering what the most effective way of allocating money is to prevent assaults, and whether awareness programs might have more impact.

Mary asks about the increase in liquor and drug offenses and arrests- much of this is a change in the classification of violations.

Nanna asks about their work with other units on campus. For example, students who were concerned about safety in lower levels of buildings asked for suggestions from Police, but it seemed difficult to coordinate with housing the costs of recommendations.

Justin asks about response to large scale emergencies. They do have prioritization of buildings, with student residences high on the list. Have set up a system of Campus Safety Partners, who work in buildings around campus and might be able to help. Self-sufficiency always important though.

Adam wonders about impact of economy, given that they will have fewer resources and crime tends to increase in downturns. They do outreach, working with communities to help them protect themselves (such as trying to spread the message among Undergrads that it’s important to lock doors). With the downturn, they have seen increases in bike thefts mirroring unemployment, and thieves now also doing things like taking copper plating from old buildings. We can always give the police a call if we see instances.

Matt would like to see more information in the brochure about how students can get help if necessary in order to respond to citations.

George asks about how they plan for budget cuts. They’ve been running about 7 people behind already, and low economy is a good chance to get good candidates, which the University seems to be aware of. They may cut out a lieutenant position, and may not fill new positions for 1.5 they were considering. They haven’t really increased their staff since 1970, but we can see how much campus has changed and law enforcement has changed.

They currently have 33 sworn officers, 6 community officers, and 10 focused on parking enforcement. The rest are civilians who work on risk management issues among others. Also have casual employees who work for particular events.

6) 7:04 Elections Committee Update (Etosha)

Listen to this segment

Having meetings coming up, including Thursday 8pm in ASSU office in Old Union, about campaign finance reform. Hope to have a bill by the beginning of next quarter that we can vote on. Execs have spent up to $7000 on campaigning; students without those financial resources might then not choose to run.

It is Maria’s birthday, so we take a break to sing.

8) 7:06 Undergrad Senate Update (Justin/Ryan)

Listen to this segment

Undergrads discussed 5-SURE, which started as discussing about whether they wanted to pass a resolution supporting it. It was started to prevent forcible rape, question of how much it does so, many rapes are by people known to assailant. There are likely to be budget cuts, so they had a discussion about how money should be allocated.
Also discussion on the use of teddy bears and how they’re treated prior to Big Game. Pointed out that there are probably better ways to use bears, such as donating them. Perhaps have students buy two bears, one to keep and one to give away. This year there doesn’t seem to have been a mass selling of teddy bears, though it ahs happened in the past.

Undergrad Senate is doing survey about fostering relationship between ASSU and Undergrads.

9) 7:13 Programming (Justin/Adam S.)

Listen to this segment

Tailgate happened, was fun.

5) 7:14 ASSU Update (George for Jonny/Fagan)

Listen to this segment

Put in request for busses to Big Game this weekend, have already put down a deposit, but don’t know total cost, because athletics departments have varied deadlines about ticket sales so they don’t know how many tickets are being sold and thus how many students will be able to go to Berkeley for the game.

They think at least 50 grad students have signed up so far for the busses. Asking us for $500. Each student pays $10 for their ticket on top of the money from other sources to help meet costs. Think total amount of bus cost will be about $30,000.

No objections, giving $500 from programming discretionary passes by consensus.

Hanna requests that the Execs be reminded about our policies about submitting requests for money ahead of time. They had a hard time working with athletics, which probably explains the delay in this case.

ASSU may well be running shuttle busses to the airport in winter, but there seems to be general consensus that we don’t wish to support this anymore.

10) 7:18 Faculty Senate Update (Adam B.)

Listen to this segment

They talked about libraries, and they’ve now made a committee to talk more about this issue. Due to budget constraints, libraries being taken down or rebuilt is unlikely to happen soon. However, they are still working on moving books to off campus storage facilities. Their plan is to digitize at least the cover and table of contents of all books that are moved. Would be tough for people in humanities who use books a lot, and also general trouble with the technology for searching that will need to be improved.

11) 7:20 Funding Request ($400) for Grad Diversity Leaders Dinner (Justin)

Listen to this segment

On Jan 14th in Havana Room, Justin would like to gather a group of targeted student group leaders over dinner to talk about how to throw good large scale events and how the GSC can support these efforts. It’s good timing in that February is Black History Month, and there are various VSOs that might want to do something, so they could get together to plan something larger. Plan on having about 30 leaders, inviting representatives of about 20 groups, which is the approximate number of large student groups.

Aleksandra asks whether email with the appropriate info might be effective. Justin thinks the OSA doesn’t disseminate knowledge well, thinks this will be a good investment to help other groups to do their funding effectively.

Giving $400 from Programming Discretionary passes by consensus.

12) 7:26 New Business (George)

Listen to this segment

Are having a GSC website party Monday evening, 6pm, there will be some food. Want volunteers to come and start putting together the new website, giving feedback about what aspects are most important. Nanna, Justin, Lan, Mary, Andrew volunteer to show up. Matt has given us all accounts in the past in order to get into the current website and make changes, but people haven’t taken the initiative to update, perhaps too complicated for us. Plan to make a flatter website that will hopefully provide more incentive and be easier to add updates.

GSC meeting 2008-11-05

Wednesday, November 5th, 2008

Proceedings of the November 5th, 2008 GSC meeting


Agenda

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Sean!)

2) 6:00 Welcome, introductions and announcements (George)
i. Please be aware that all meetings are audio recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approve minutes from the last meeting (10/29/08) with the following correction:
We have $26,000, not $2,600 available in co-sponsorship.
iii. Happy Birthday to George and Fen!

3) 6:05 Funding (Addy)
i. The Science Bus
ii. Vision and Ophthalmology Interest Group
iii. Stanford Solar & Wind Energy Projects
iv. Asian American Graduate Student Association
v. Stanford India Association

4) 6:15 ASSU Update (Jonny and Fagan)

5) 6:19 Undergrad Senate Report (Ryan and Justin)

6) 6:23 Programming (Justin and Adam S.)

7) 6:27 Faculty Senate Report (Adam B.)

8) 6:30 Stanford Dining (Eric and Michael)

9) 6:50 Stanford Dance Marathon (Diana and Jessie)

10) 7:00 GSC Food Czar Replacement (Nanna)

11) 7:05 Rec Swim Hours Update (Nanna)

12) 7:10 NomCom Supplementary Funding Request of $500 (Eric Osborne)

13) 7:15 GSPB Magician Supplementary Funding Request of $256 (Nanna)

14) 7:20 Votes to fill At-Large seats (George)

15) 7:40 Publicity (Zeng and Ivette)

16) 7:50 New Business (George)

Attendance

Voting members present:
At large 1: Aleksandra Korolova
At large 2: Adam Beberg
At large 3: Nanna Notthoff
Business: Rick Thielke
Earth Sciences: Justin Brown
Education: Shane Moise
Engineering 1: Polina Segalova
Engineering 2: Addy Satija
Humanities: George Bloom
Law: Andrew Park
Natural Sciences: Fen Zhao
Medicine: Sean Young (proxy Maria Spletter present)

Voting members not present:
At large 4: Not filled
At large 5: Not filled
Social Sciences: Hanna Muenke

Other people present: Peng Shu, Shelley Gao (UG Senator), Dan Stringer, Varun Mittal, Ping Li (Funding Committee), Wenxiu Ma (ACSSS Funding), Mary Van der Hoven, Alex Sugarbaker (Science Bus), Simone Manganelli, Matt Turk, Andrew Danowitz, Daisy Chen (Stanford Daily), Maskall Bennett, Diane Lee, Dan Chang, Lakshmi Mohan, Melahn Parker, Jason Lang, Matt McLaughlin, Ryan Peacock

Minutes

Many many thanks to Nanna for taking minutes this week. Slight edits made by Hanna afterwards.

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Nanna!)

2) 6:03 Welcome, introductions and announcements (George)

Listen to this segment

i. Please be aware that all meetings are audio recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approved minutes from the last meeting (10/29/08) by consensus with the following correction:
We have $26,000, not $2,600 available in co-sponsorship.
iii. Happy Birthday, Fen and George! There is cake.

3) 6:06 Funding (Addy)

Listen to this segment

Listen to this segment

i. Chinese Student Organization (6:06)
Chinese New Year: Organized in January, at Alumni Center, 500 grad students expected, whole budget is about $12,000 ($7,500 from ASSU), requesting $4,500 total from GSC ($300 for honoraria, $1,200 for programming, $2,100 for food, $1,000 for something I did not catch). Co-hosting with Hong Kong student association. [Projector problem again, move on, come back to this later, so remaining audio separated.]
Back at 6:20pm. Originally requested $11,750, but line items are above cap, and this is more than we give for co-sponsored events. Asked them to look for other sources as well.

Fen asks if $4,000 comes out of $8,000 max per VSO? No, it’s from pot ($10,000) set aside for groups who are co-sponsoring events. More than 500 grad students expected. After this, only $500 would be left in that pot because other organizations also had cosponsored events.

Fen asks: Did group submit yearly budget? Addy: Not yet, but this doesn’t count for $8,000 cap.

Justin asks: Does ratio of money from undergrad senate to undergrad attendance match ratio of money from GSC to grad student attendance? Yes, same ratio.

Giving $4,500 passes by consensus. [finish this item at 6:25]

ii. The Science Bus (6:25pm)
Science bus is community service organization, meeting twice a week, go to East Palo Alto charter school to teach science to second through fifth graders. Request total of $2,600 for member recruitment BBQs, and lesson supplies ($1,000 for food, $1,500 programming, $100 marketing). This is a community service group, so no caps.

Question about how many grad students participate.
Maybe 25-50 grads total. For each lesson, about 5-10 grads.

Giving $2,600 passes by consensus.

iii. Asian American Graduate Student Association (6:27)
Social support network for Asian and Asian American community and supporters. Expanding programming by adding workshops. Requesting $450 for food. Funding committee recommends $450.

Mission: Community, identity, professional activities. Asian American issues: History, mental health, relationships. Create a space for Asian Americans to discuss these issues. Only offered for undergrads so far by A3C, want to create such an opportunity for grads. In 2006-07 two incidents that caused Asian Americans to come together (suicide of one female Asian grad student at Stanford, Virginia tech incident (Korean student)).

Giving $450 passes by consensus.

iv. Asha (6:31)
Community service group, raise funds for education in India and monitor the funds and activities. 2 big fundraisers per year, one is Holi, other is V concert. Funding request today is for V concert. Requesting $3,441.31 (broken down for janitorial services, programming, equipment, honoraria, events and labor). This will be in Kresge Nov 13 or 15 (didn’t catch the date), 7pm. Music, Indian comedian. Last year, event was in Oak Lounge, but need bigger venue this year as it was too crowded. This is not a joint VSO.

Recommended $3419.51 (request changed by the organization, Funding Committee recommends all – this is a community service group, no caps).

Fen asks: Do they have 8,000 cap? Addy: No. But yes to caps for line items. First time they are coming this year.

Melahn asks: Do they plan to request funding for second event (Holi)? Yes, around $3,000-$4,000. (3000 people expected for that).Will end up requesting about $7,000 from GSC for the whole year.

Giving $3419.51 passes by consensus.

v. Other groups not here:
Stanford India Association, Sarvodaya, Vision and Ophthalmology Interest Group, Stanford Solar & Wind Energy Projects

4) 6:08 ASSU Update (Jonny and Fagan)
Not here

5) 6:08 Undergrad Senate Report (Ryan and Justin)
Shelley said this was a pretty quick meeting. Justin and Ryan were unable to go.

6) 6:08 Programming (Justin and Adam S.)

Listen to this segment

Elections party in 750 yesterday (November 4) was well-attended, lots of fun.

Next big event will be Stanford vs. USC tailgate, will be at Ford Plaza, in front of ACSR, Saturday, November 15, starts at noon. Help appreciated starting at 9am. Talk to Justin, if you can help.

Grad Formal scheduled for Saturday April 25, 2009.

7) 6:10 Faculty Senate Report (Adam B.)

Listen to this segment

Everyone should have gotten a letter from president and provost about budget cuts, mainly affects humanities because money comes from endowment and general fees payout. Engineering should not be too affected.

8) 6:11 GSC Food Czar Replacement (Nanna)

Listen to this segment

Nanna reports that Sean is the GSC food czar, but has been off-campus since summer. Thanking Sean for still keeping up with the ordering of the food while he is gone. But there are some other tasks that are part of being the food czar, such as set-up, clean-up, receiving delivery, making sure we have a supply of drinks and cutlery (purchasing those, if necessary), etc. Fine for others to help with that, but those tasks that require local presence have had to be completely taken over by others in Sean’s absence. Today, Nanna ordered the food, since Sean is out of the country and didn’t know if he would have access to a computer. Given that it currently seems to be difficult for Sean to fulfill his responsibilities as Food Czar, Nanna suggests finding a replacement, at least until he returns. There is a stipend for the position.

Shane volunteers to fill the position, starting next week.

9) 6:12 Rec Swim Hours Update (Nanna)

Listen to this segment

Meeting today with Eric Stein (Senior Associate Athletic Director, Physical Education, Recreation, and Wellness) and Rebecca Carpenter (Avery Aquatic Manager), attended by Alex Hirsch (he started the petition), Nanna (representing the GSC), Matt Winterbourne (undergrad, lobbied for extended library hours). A UG Senate rep was supposed to attend, but didn’t show.

Alex gives brief update: 965 signatures on petition, as of today, thanks Rec sports people for having 7am-9am morning swim at Roble (but adds that response might not have been that great because of Roble’s small size and not so great location), 10am-2pm swim at Avery hard for many people to make (may be ok for undergrads, but hard for grads, post-docs, staff, faculty, who were a large group responding to the petition).

Alex thinks we need more “off-business” hours, before 9am, after 5pm or 6pm. Proposes to have evening swim 5-8pm or 6-9pm, morning 6-9am, keep afternoon slot, perhaps add some time at Roble to prevent over-crowding. Alex thinks overcrowding mostly a problem in fall and spring. Says that different schedules for different days would be ok, but Rebecca says it’s easier to keep things consistent, especially for communication with the coaches. Rebecca started doing head counts and can come back with data regarding the overcrowding issue (it seems the main problem is the prescribed pace for the lanes (slow, med, fast) and people having difficulty choosing the right lane).

Rebecca points out that Stanford has 6-7 aquatic varsity teams, more than other universities. She is here since June, so pretty new, still figuring things out. She comes from George Mason University, where she managed the pools. There she had separate pools for athletics teams and rec swim and could hold very good rec swim programs, but this seems hard at Stanford.

Rebecca says, apart from varsity and rec swim, there are other groups using the pool. One of them is SCRA, which is a type of country club that is part of the Stanford community. For some reason, they really used the pool a lot this fall, thus constraints on evening schedule, but should be better in winter and spring. Gunn High-school will have their last day of pool use this Friday; after that will expand space for evening swim at Avery from 7 to 14 lanes.

Eric, who is also in charge of the BeWell (Stanford wellness) program willing to look into this issue. He and Rebecca think evening swim is easier to tackle than morning because in the morning need to preserve flexibility for varsity teams, also seems to be less demand for morning (maybe it’s too cold now), so plan to reduce morning swim in winter, bring back in spring.

Eric reports that meetings about budgets are coming up in the next few weeks, need to discuss rec sports budget in light of overall budget cuts of the university. At the same time, Eric thinks if this is a real need, money shouldn’t be the obstacle. Emphasizes that he thinks it’s great he is hearing from students (hasn’t really heard much thus far), and that he tries to respond (gives example of extending hours at ACSR from 7am-11pm to 6am-1am). Eric wants to hear about the needs first, then see what he can do, then possibly let us know if he needs help. He says he is responsible for “the world of rec sports” and thinks that things can be figured out and shifted to meet the needs.

Eric and Rebecca reluctant to disclose finances – they say it is against the policies. But Rebecca does mention that heating for the pools is very expensive – it’s $60,000/month, and that doesn’t include any other operating expenses. Rebecca adds that another issue is staffing – hard to find life guards. They have paid staff, for policy reasons cannot have volunteers, but paid students are just fine (if certified). Certification classes coming up. Nanna encourages Rebecca to forward this information – we will distribute this info to constituents, undergrads should do the same. Certified student life guard gets paid $14/hour. Another issue are the availability of locker rooms (cannot overcrowd them) and the manpower it takes to get pools ready.

Eric and Rebecca say that they will definitely look into more evening swim at Avery, possibly two days of morning to start with. They are very reluctant to accept any help from students/student reps, say they will report back next week.

Addy asks if Gunn High-school and SCRA have fixed time slots or can come whenever. Nanna: They have fixed time slots.

Ryan says SCRA has own pool near Rains. Justin says it’s under construction. Should be done by the end of the fall though, so no more constraints by SCRA then (like the Rec people said).

Ryan and Mary wonder, if they let the pool cool down every night and find it unlikely. Say costs of life guards shouldn’t be so bad given operating costs.

10) 6:36 NomCom Supplementary Funding Request of $500 (Nanna for Eric Osborne)

Listen to this segment

NomCom requesting additional funds for training (budgeted $6,000 overall, with the following break-down: $1,500 Encina Hall rental, $120 janitor service, $250 misc events and labor services, $4,130 catering). Say that $6,000 is 63% of annual NomCom budget. Requesting $500 from GSC, and also from UG Senate and ASSU Exec, respectively. Say that without extra funding, only have about $2,500 for catering, which they find hard to work with, given the $16/person cost for catering. Say they had extra money left over from last year, but didn’t realize that SSE fiscal year ends June 30 and that they would be unable to use it.

Nanna says General Discretionary could be the source (had $4,690 allocated; $3,200 left).

Aleksandra asks: how many people are on NomCom? Melahn says probably 250 people. Aleksandra thinks budget for catering is too high given number of committees. She says there are probably not 125 grads on the committees. Adam B. says there are about 50 committees. Maria says it’s training for everyone from NomCom. Some people are confused and think that we fund NomCom. Matt McL. clarifies and says their other money is from endowment payout says. Matt adds that NomCom has not done training in past, but Eric is very ambitious. Polina points out catering also includes labor, cutlery, etc.; that’s why it costs co much.

Two objections, so we go to a roll call vote. In favor: 5 Opposed: 5 Abstaining: 2

Giving $500 to NomCom for training does not pass.

11) 6:42 Stanford Dining (Eric and Michael)

Listen to this segment

Eric Montell (Executive Director for Stanford Dining) introduces himself. Stanford dining has changed; still have all the dining halls (as before), now also summer conferences, training, Schwab (executive education). Have been working on several initiatives with Justin’s help. New: Grad Meal plan. Really looked at how to provide value to grad students at price that would be conducive to grad student lifestyle, have lunch and dinner plans.

Now also looking at dining from event perspective (faculty speakers with topic of interest to grads). Planned: 10-12 environmental faculty series per year, had first one in October, next event in Wilbur on November 12. Topic will be Sustainable Seafood, with people from Monterey Bay Aquarium, Ethics and Society Center, Alaska Seafood Technical Director, and others. Setting up registration for upcoming event. Trying to get grads to come to undergrad dining halls. These events are a new service.

Michael Grotz (Dining Hospitality and Retail Services Director) introduces himself. In charge of Stanford guest house, concessions at stadium, retail dining locations. Was at USC before coming here (11 years). New at Stanford. Wants to learn new things, find out about grads’ priorities. Says he is pro-student. Thinks students bring important issues to the table. Wants to bring value to retail cafes, e.g., at Tresidder. Peet’s converted. New: organic yogurt at Tresidder (contract has been signed with Fraiche, with formal announcement expected in the next few weeks). Michael has background in retail and hospitality (worked in hotels for many years).

Eric: Munger is coming, and will have store and café and banquet hall. Law school and GSB students and variety of others will be living there and making use of this. Will seek input regarding menu and prices from grads.

Michael: Like to develop more of a unique characteristic in their facilities. Axe and Palm is popular, already had menu feedback. Goal is to have unique facilities with good ambiance, not goal to compete with other facilities on campus, but have dining facilities stand out. Students have impact over the long term!

Melahn says: Request for Michael Pollen for the speaker series because he is local. Eric thinks it’s a good idea.

Melahn asks: What did you mean with not wanting to compete? Dining: Most important goal to bring value to students, not cheaper at cost of quality. Dining evolves around student lifestyles; students expect different things year to year, expectations change.

Melahn asks: What fraction of cost is labor? Dining: It’s the most significant cost. But good point because one thing important to students is how employees are treated and paid. Dining pays a living wage to its employees, other facilities don’t.

Addy reports he has been a meal plan member last year when there was no grad meal plan, grad meal plan has decreased his cost by half, says thanks. Asks, if there are plans for breakfast on grad meal plan (would specifically like it at 750). Dining: No current plans for breakfast at 750, but possibly at Tresidder. Need to see, if and where there would be demand.

Dining is thinking about creating a grad family meal plan, asks if that would be added value?
Melahn suggests: Have it around off-hours of undergrad facilities, so the costs for dining don’t increase. Justin says: Quick answer to family plan question: not sure, doesn’t have kids. Do you have business cards and ways to get in touch? Dining pass around contact info to some GSC members. Suggest to look for contact info on website. Adam B. says: Location would be a problem for families; plan would be too expensive given what employees would have to be paid.

Fen reports she didn’t know about grad meal plan, doesn’t reach everyone, suggests Dining talk about it and promote it better. Grad meal plan: $5.95 for lunch bought in blocks of 5, $6.95 for dinner in blocks of 5, all you can eat, any undergrad dining hall, doesn’t expire. Dining halls ONLY.

Munger will be retail café, not a dining hall.

Addy comes back to the topic of breakfast: He talked to Marcela (from GLO), and she said that nobody comes to 750 for breakfast. Justin said yesterday’s breakfast was a special event; usually there is not breakfast at 750. Addy asks about cardinal dollars, Dining responds that they can be ordered online, but that there are some places that don’t accept them, such as Nexus at the Clark Center (near the Medical School).

Addy says: Dining halls close to grad housing (such as Stern near Crothers and CroMem) are very crowded for lunch. Addy asks: Are there plans of expanding service in Branner Dining Hall (one place where the Grad Meal plan can be used)? Dining says: No.

Ryan asks: Are all dining halls near undergrad residences? Someone says no. One is next to Lyman. Ryan thinks there should be dining halls near new buildings, like lab buildings (especially for lunch), e.g., near new med school buildings. Dining says, yes, this is an issue because the infrastructure there has grown a lot.

Another big issue: How many cafes can this campus really support, such that they do a good job, have enough customers? If there are too many cafes, it degrades the whole program. There are plans though to put a new café into new med school buildings.

Ryan says: Late night/dinner services: Not that many options (Mary says: Treehouse, 750, hospital are available).

Adam B. says: There is nothing anywhere near Clarke that takes cardinal dollars. Do something about that (suggests new facility or ask them to take cardinal dollars). Dining explains: Can create low cost plans by capturing the overhead costs somehow (staff, electricity, etc.). If they spread it out a lot, they can’t do that anymore.

Fen asks: Is there any chance of getting a dining hall near EV? Since Munger will only have retail? Fen wants a real dining hall near EV. Dining cannot build a dining hall independently. But Michael says: Munger programming still has to be determined, how it will look (breakfast vs. lunch vs. dinner, what are the expectations for opening hours, need more discussion). If anyone wants to serve on Munger advisory committee, they will recruit in next few weeks. It involves brainstorming ideas about café, convenience store, etc. Asks us to put a group together and then contact dining with the names. Polina agrees to do that.

Shane asks: What percentage of products is locally produced or organic? Dining says: Around 40%. Really focused this year on seafood, challenging because it’s a wild product, changing. Trying to partner with Monterey Bay Aquarium. Schwab was rated #1 exec conference center in the world for 2 or 3 years in a row, so pressure to keep that up. Wanting to expand sustainability program with students. Employ 20 students as gardeners. How can we grow more products on the campus itself? Organic herb and vegetable gardens are at every dining hall. Plan to look for co-ops of farmers, can overwhelm individuals with volume alone. Cannot rely on one farmer because maybe that person sometimes cannot deliver something that’s necessary. They are trying to work with family farmers on becoming organic. Had a discussion with other universities, talked with Peter Singer (Princeton, I think), this organic development is a process, gradual.

Melahn says: Maybe you could have increased participation of grads, if you offer more discounts or deliver and take-out. Thinks GCC seems best place to serve food to grads. Suggests creating a meal plan at 750. Or replace 750 possibly?

Person from Asian American Graduate Student Organization: Establishing some graduate dining hall would be nice. Doesn’t think that family meal plan can be successful if it’s far away from families. Thinks families also wouldn’t necessarily want to share dining halls with undergrads who have quite different demographics.

Dining cannot build a new facility because they have to compete for space with new academic buildings. Have a general use permit.

Grad meal plan: Trying to get the price right, know grad students are on tight budgets. Say it’s great, if you can cut your price with this, especially because food prices are really going up!

Dining asks: How does the GCC still remain the GCC with the new Munger facilities? What do we want in terms of programming for GCC and Munger? Equal? How can we keep great life at GCC AND also have something at Munger?

12) 7:16 GSPB Magician Supplementary Funding Request of $256 (Nanna)

Listen to this segment

GSPB is requesting an additional $256 for the Magician Show on November 14 (in addition to $500 that we approved last week) to increase length of show from 40 minutes to 1 hour 15 minutes. This would come from GSPB Co-sponsorship from Co-sponsorship line item in Programming account.

Addy is concerned that it might not fit in the budget, and they might go over budget but Nanna reports that she received a budget from Robert and Annemarie, and that GSPB has everything well-planned out.

Giving $256 to GSPB from Co-sponsorship passes by consensus

13) 7:18 Stanford Dance Marathon (Diana and Jessie)

Listen to this segment

They are looking to include grad community in this, not just undergrads. Want to know what community service looks like for grads. Are grads interested in participating/coming to Dance Marathon (DM)?

Dance marathon was started at Stanford 5 years ago, goal to raise awareness about HIV and support international health issues.

Each year have dancers register to stay on feet for 24 hours, also need moralers who stay for 3 hours, all raise money (moralers less than dancers). Choose their own beneficiaries, this year in organizations in Rwanda and San Mateo.

Also want to support individuals who want to provide service. Past two years, they raised over $100,000. This year Face Aids is matching all money raised, aiming for over $200,000. This is going to health and nutrition and school programs with Partners in Health (www.pih.org) for Rwanda. Also working with Ellipse in San Mateo county.

Last year: 600 dancers. In the past, had some med and law students participate. How to reach more grads?

Also have a contemplation room, which is educational.

Also have family day for Stanford and outside community (games, activities, food).

Campus Team: events, community, campus.

This year, dancers goal is to raise $192 each, describe how much money can do what ($120 for ARV’s for a year, etc.)

Community Team: local business and corporate outreach. This year another component of DM: 24 hours of technical service, Google, Yahoo, and others will sponsor.

Upcoming events (dm.stanford.edu). Dancer deadline: Nov 21. Big game t-shirts to benefit HIV organizations. Paul Farmer coming to speak Nov 14, World AIDs day coming up Dec 1st, etc.

More info/interest – contact Diana Willard dianaw@stanford.edu

Polina asks them to send information to GSC. Also submit to grad events! Get in touch with Andy Hernandez (GLO) about Family Day.

Justin asks: Would you be interested in having an event in Grad land to sign people up? Get in touch with Justin. Diana says, yes interested, perhaps want to come to Comedy Night to sign people up.

Addy suggests having a table at USC tailgate.

Addy says partners in health has been cleared by UNICEF and another organizations to prevent spread of HIV from mother to child.

Fen asks about “mechanics” of dance marathon: Do you have to dance the whole time? What if you cannot dance? Diana: It’s about the support and staying for 24 hours, but really it’s a whole year of fundraising and community service. The actual DM day is just for community building. Justin says DM is a party. Diana invites everyone to stop by, usually cover charge of $10 which gets donated to the beneficiaries.

14) 7:30 Publicity (Zeng and Ivette)

Listen to this segment

Zeng and Ivette are working on next publicity event: Happy Hour with GSC. Maybe join in on other happy hours around campus? Idea of going to the students, instead of having students come to us. Maybe donating some wine.

Addy says that there are departments that have enough wine and beer. Thinks it’s a good idea to go, even without giving people an incentive.

Polina says: Get in touch with people running the happy hours to make sure it’s ok to go. Have a member of GSC from that department present.

15) 7:33 Votes to fill At-Large seats (Polina)

Listen to this segment

We have two vacant voting seats. They are both At-large seats. One of them is vacant because Karan Chaudhry, who was holding the seat, no longer has time to fulfill his role as a GSC rep. Then other is the seat that Ryan was holding as an interim rep. At the retreat, we decided to fill these mid-year open seats by announcing to the GSC-members list at least a week before the vote what positions would be up for consideration. Polina did send an email to the GSC-members list last week to announce today’s vote for the two At-large seats.

Addy asks: Was Ryan voting today? Ryan says no.

Four people want the position: Ryan Peacock, Mary Van der Hoven, Melahn Parker, Jason Lang.

Polina explains that each voting member will have two votes since there are two vacant seats.

Candidates introduce themselves.

Mary: School of Earth Sciences, coming to GSC meetings since summer, encouraged by some people to run, was originally somewhat afraid of time commitment. Can offer different perspective from other people because she has been around longer, and her perspective is not that represented on the GSC so far.

Ryan: Was an At-large rep for the last few months, wants to continue. He has been active with Legislative Action, went to D.C., serves on our behalf at NAGPS, will definitely continue that, acts as liason to UG senate.

Melahn: 6th year grad student in Engineering, has been involved with Stanford community (GSPB and GSC in the last two years), other activities, events, bringing people to run comedy, other larger campus events. Considers himself very engaged in campus life. Ran for Engineering position in last Spring’s election, but was removed because he was not a registered student. Now he is registered, next quarter as well. Wants to take on the responsibility of having a vote and being a regular attendee and wants to be part of the decisions.

Jason Lang: 1st year MBA at GSB, just found out about GSC last week through Kristina Keating via dependent healthcare initiative. Started to rally for support at GSB for dependent healthcare and started a petition for that, wants to be involved with the GSC healthcare advocacy group. Wants better integration of GSB with rest of Stanford. Really interested in working on integrating grad communities.

Candidates leave the room for the discussion and vote.

No audio or written recording of discussion about the candidates.

After the vote, Ryan will be the new At-Large 4 Rep; Mary is the new At-Large 5 Rep. Will be sworn in next week.

16) 7:46 New Business (Polina)

[Audio recorder did not recorded this part.] Justin reports that GSPB is doing really good programming now, almost every day. Money really getting used, make sure you get on grad events email list!

Adjourned 7:47.

GSC meeting 2008-11-12

Wednesday, November 5th, 2008

Proceedings of the November 12th 2008 GSC meeting


Agenda

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Shane!)

2) 6:00 Welcome, introductions and announcements (Polina)
i. Please be aware that all meetings are audio recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approve minutes from the last meeting (11/05/08) with the following changes:
- Some factual changes in the Dining section about specific dining locations and what they offer.

3) 6:05 Funding (Addy)
i. Stanford Student Biodesign
ii. Nigerian Students Association (Naija)
iii. Stanford Alpine Project

4) 6:15 ASSU Update (Jonny and Fagan)

5) 6:20 Undergrad Senate Report (Ryan and Justin)

6) 6:25 Programming (Justin and Adam S.)

7) 6:30 Diversity Committee Update (DAC Representative)

8) 6:35 NAGPS Update (Fen and George)

9) 6:50 eGroups Update (Matt McLaughlin)

10) 7:05 Committee on Graduate Studies (Danielle and Cameron)

11) 7:25 Supplementary Funding Request ($256) for Elections Party (Justin)

12) 7:30 Funding Source Modification for Chinese Student Group (Addy)

13) 7:35 Supplementary Funding Request ($500) for NomCom (Eric)

14) 7:45 Swearing in of new At-Large reps (Polina)

15) 7:50 New Business (Polina)

Attendance

Voting members present:
At large 1: Aleksandra Korolova
At large 2: Adam Beberg
At large 3: Nanna Notthoff
At large 4: Ryan Peacock (not voting yet)
At large 5: Mary Van der Hoven (not voting yet)
Business: Rick Thielke
Earth Sciences: Justin Brown (proxy Simone Manganelli present)
Education: Shane Moise
Engineering 1: Polina Segalova
Engineering 2: Addy Satija
Humanities: George Bloom
Law: Andrew Park
Natural Sciences: Fen Zhao
Medicine: Sean Young (proxy Maria Spletter present)
Social Sciences: Hanna Muenke

Voting members not present:

Other people present: Shelley Gao (UGrad Senate), Joseph Lau (VSO), Mohammad Hekmat, Vincent Le Chenavec (FSSA), John Ten Hoeve, Adam Sciambi, Peng Shu, Daisy Chen (Daily), Matt McLaughlin, Shashank Gupta (Sarvodaya), Abhinav Agrawal (Sarvodaya), Alex Ene, G. Hippolyte, Eric Osborne (NomCom)

Minutes

1) 5:45 FOOD (thanks Shane!)

2) 6:01 Welcome, introductions and announcements (Polina)

Listen to this segment

i. Please be aware that all meetings are audio recorded and will be made available on the GSC website.
ii. Approved minutes from the last meeting (11/05/08) by consensus with the following changes:
- Some factual changes in the Dining section about specific dining locations and what they offer.
iii. Thanksgiving website is up. 256 signed up so far, total capacity is 1500.
iv. A Grad student in EE passed away last week. There will be services on campus, attendees are requested to wear bright clothes.

3) 6:06 Funding (Addy)

Listen to this segment

Listen to this segment

i. Asha for Education. Need $173.69 in addition to their previous request. Thought they just needed monitors, but now also need to separately rent other equipment such as cables. Actual increased cost is higher, but they have found some sources for those. Also now need to rent tables, since the ones we planned to have available aren’t ready yet. Giving $174 passes by consensus.

ii. Stanford Alpine Project – Group of students, mainly from Geology department. Do fundraisers, then every few years go on Geological field trips. Planning to go to Iceland this summer. Having a chili cookoff next Friday as a fundraiser. Requesting $700 for that. Fen asks about possibility of working within Stanford Outdoors umbrella – they haven’t been involved with that yet, but might look into it for some activity options. Giving $700 passes by consensus.

iii. French Stanford Student Association. Will be having a Wine and Cheese event, for which they previously requested some money. They’re doubling the size of event though, so need another $400. Giving $400 more passes by consensus.

iv. Persian Student Association. Requested money for Classical music series (for honorarium) and would now like to serve refreshments after the event, so are asking money for that. They are not at their $8000 cap yet. Giving $300 passes by consensus.

v. Sarvodaya – Name means ‘Welfare for all’ and they try to do social service. Would like to show movie about Gandhi and have dinner for 70-80 people. Giving $750 passes by consensus.

vi. Stanford Solar and Wind Energy Projects. This is their second year, are 75% Graduate Students. Assess resources on campus, seek to increase the amount of reuseable energy that Stanford uses. Having a speaker series, much of the money is planned for food and honorarium for those. Have already had three speakers, next one in two weeks. Also asking for some conference registration fees. Some of the requested budget was planned for equipment to measure wind in Salinas, but we don’t fund capital equipment for VSOs, but it’s not clear from the initial budget presented which portion was for that. Polina suggests working offline to get the details worked out, so we’ll come back to this later. Not approving yet.

vii. Stanford Student Biodesign. Goal is to connect students to BioX initiative. Requesting money for a speaker series, think it will draw 150 students. Particular upcoming event is a lecture about consulting and biotech followed by dinner. Recommended $610. Giving $610 passes by consensus.

viii. Stanford Student Biodesign and Nigerian Students Association (Naija) are not present.

Taking a food break 6:21. Stopped recorder.

6:29 Back to Stanford Solar and Wind Energy Projects. $1687 of their proposed budget is for things we can fund, like honorarium, food, marketing, and conference fees. Giving $1687 passes by consensus.

4) 6:30 ASSU Update (Jonny and Fagan)
Not here.

5) 6:30 Undergrad Senate Report (Ryan and Shelley)

Listen to this segment

The Undergrads now take minutes at their Senate meetings, and can forward them to us if we’d like.
Shelley reports that they’re trying to encourage more intergroup interactions, similar to what we have done.

6) 6:31 Programming (Adam S.)

Listen to this segment

Tailgate soon, Formal in April.

7) 6:32 Diversity Committee Update (Shane)

Listen to this segment

Working on a new Grad Student Life survey, and are putting questions together now. Plan to use this to guide their priorities for the next year. Suggestion to get feedback on survey design from GSC people who have worked on other ones.

8) 6:34 NAGPS Update (Fen and George and Ryan)

Listen to this segment

NAGPS is National Association of Graduate and Professional Students. Work with other schools to develop platform for things that affect all graduate students, then lobby in DC.

Fen and George went to 2008 NAGPS conference in Minnesota. 70 students from various universities attended.

In terms of structure, there’s a NAGPS Board, with advocacy committees, executive board, regional coordinators, and constitution/by-laws maintenance. On issues, each school gets one vote, and there are 80 member schools.

Have four main committees:
Legislative Concerns
Social Justice (Bill of Rights for Graduate Students, Human Diversity)
International Student Concerns (Visa and employment issues, works with Council of Graduate Schools)
Employment Concers (Healthcare, stipends, housing, survey piloted at Brigham Young
Public Relations is also a committee, but less central.

Some conference events:
Had speakers on
- National Grad Crisis Hotline, 1800-GRADHLP
- BetterWorldBooks
- InsideHigherEd (free online publication)
Workshops. There were lots, these are what Fen attended.
- Grad housing – closed with 6-month warning at University of Cincinnati. They compiled some stats at the time that might be helpful for any other schools facing trouble with housing for graduate students.
- Communication ideas. They liked Wiki sites, personal contact (though what that looks like at a big school is unclear)
Book: 101 Ways to build an effective graduate-professional student organization. Will at some point be online at nagps.org

Legislative Action plans
- Down to 3 pages and 40 points
- Student rights: healthcare, child care, equity with undergrads, 1st amendment
- Higher Education Funding: student loans, federal funding to universities, grants, RISE Act
- International Student Issues: visas, country caps, SEVIS, federal aid, equal access to leave
- Educational Policy: Diversity, pipeline, advisory committee, Grad-Prof student appreciation week
- Tax Policy: Restore tax exemptions, FICA exemption (why we don’t pay social security tax)
- Chose not to focus on green energy this year, figure there’s enough other groups focusing on that that grad students in particular don’t need to put their energy towards that.

There’s a Western Regional Conference, to be held (probably) April 2-4 2009. Lots of school in the region that could be involved. May well focus on healthcare and housing, though this is to be decided. Ryan will play a role in organizing this.

Mary wants to know why tax policy isn’t a higher priority. Issues aren’t necessarily listed in a priority order. When you go to DC, you have talking points on everything, and can also talk about other things that you feel are relevant. Mary actually meant why tax policy wasn’t being considered as a topic for the Western Regional Conference. Conferences are a chance to talk about things that in particular affect the schools involved less so than national issues. At least for us and Davis, housing and healthcare are big issues. Berkeley also lost their dependent health care this year, others have as well, so it may well be a broader issue to be explored. This is not what goes to legislative action necessarily.

9) 6:56 eGroups Update (Matt McLaughlin)

Listen to this segment

Banking/Capital Group have created an infrastructure for banking for groups.

eGroups now has a function for eChecks (so groups don’t need to collect paper checks for payment) and also eTicketing. This will allow groups to do ticketing online cheaper than other options right now.

The Stanford Ticket Office, which we’ve used in the past, has set-up fee of $30, then 3.5% for credit cards (the actual charge is 1.8-2.2%, so they’re taking a margin), $1.50-$4.50 convenience fee, etc. These fee can really add up.

Egroups does 2.2% + 30 cents. This also allows the money to stay in-house at ASSU. Makes accounting easier, and means GSC would get money faster. Set-up would be $20, also less than the Ticket Office.

Nanna says we did use Egroups last year for bus tickets, which went well. Manager for eGroups seems to be good communicator.

Fen in past had to choose which ticket system to go with for formal. At that point 75% of people bought in person at ticket office, which the Stanford Ticket Office was good for. Right now, the eGroups is set up for online purchasing only, though tickets could be picked up in person afterwards. Keeping money in house is good though –few years back took over a year for them to get money back to the GSC from the ticket sales. Needed to get Ken Hsu’s help in the end on that.

Addy asks whether CAs could use it. Right now it’s only for student groups. eCommerce was not comfortable with it being broader. They have other solutions for different arenas, seem to prefer keeping them separate.

Ryan thinks that people who went to ticket office in past did so to avoid Will Call (which was the only option if you bought ticket online), so if they could pick up tickets after purchasing online more people might do so. In this case, could pick up 9-5 at ASSU, or could print them out on their own.

Fen concerned about forgeries if it’s just printouts.

Mary wonders whether we could get ID cards programmed, but Matt thinks this would be prohibitively expensive and would require coordinating with University.

Addy thinks eliminating the wait would be good, thinks we could figure out details of ticket security.

Matt thinks their office could come up with a good solution.

Simone reminds us that there are various situations that would need to be taken into account (people buying in different ways at different times, including at the door), but these are details that could be figured out.

10) 7:12 Committee on Graduate Studies (Danielle and Cameron)

Listen to this segment

Their committee looks at University wide policies.

So far, the agenda, driven by VPGE and talking with smaller groups of students is as follows:
Interdisciplinary programs and how credit units differ in departments.
Rule that PhD students have two years to get to Candidacy, but departments differentially enforce this.
Co-term issues (numbers have grown a lot recently)
Academic Advising
School calendar for 09-10 year – looking to adjust add/drop and lengthen withdrawal, make it consistent and include Law School as they switch to quarters.

Other ideas:
- Rule that you can only apply to one program at a time.
- Making it easier to take classes in other departments. No one says no, but there’s always bureaucracy to get enrolled. For example, hard to register on Axess for Business School class if you’re not in B-school. They’re also on a different schedule with deadlines too.
- TGR fees. Provost’s ideal of everyone finishing in 5 year doesn’t happen. It’s 40% of normal fees. Especially for Humanities, who may not have continued funding and need to pay out-of-pocket, that’s a lot to cover.
- Faculty can’t change grades in Axess after a deadline
- Other comments about how Axess sucks. Don’t think the new version is an improvement. It’s slow, difficult to navigate. Aleksandra reports that she was part of student group who was shown the new site early for feedback, but they didn’t actually take most of the suggestions. Perhaps need some more pushing.
- Search Function doesn’t work well, defaults to Undergrad, so then you can’t do a broad search for classes.
- Nanna found that HelpSU did not really help resolve Axess issue.
- Registrar refuses to certify any outside forms of proof of enrollment.
- Teaching evaluations problematic. Sometimes the system just doesn’t collect feedback due to errors. Other problem is that it has a very specific mold for how classes are set-up, so if there are multi-TA classes it’s hard to evaluate.

Contact info: dharlan@stanford.edu (Danielle) and cmackenz@stanford.edu (Cameron). They welcome any feedback. Good for us to all be on same page for what students need and all push the University on the same issues.

11) 7:27 Supplementary Funding Request ($368) for Elections Party (Nanna)

Listen to this segment

We had approved $400, but they had larger turnout than expected and also went longer. It was a good party. $368 now requested to cover the difference for what we initially approved and what it ultimately cost, to come from Programming Discretionary. Giving $368 passes by consensus.

12) 7:29 Funding Source Modification for Chinese Student Group (Addy)

Listen to this segment

Last week we funded Chinese Student Group for $4500 for Lunar New Year party, which they are hosting along with Hong Kong and Taiwanese student groups. The money came from co-sponsorship funds that we set aside for groups working together. ($10,000 total). Addy thinks this $10,000 would be better served for smaller VSOs working together, and that we should instead fund the Lunar New Year Party from the $10,000 that we previously approved coming from the reserves in order to fund large events.

Funding committee gets money from GSGF, from which individual groups apply for money for events, up to an $8000 cap.
There’s a separate $10,000 for events co-sponsored by multiple VSOs.
Also, we approved separate money for large events, with the money coming from either unallocated funds from the previous year in the Funding Committee, or up to $10,000 additionally from the reserves for this.

Nanna would like to know what other groups have asked for money from the co-sponsorship.
Persian/Muslim Awareness Network put on an event, Diwali Party was co-hosted, and the Muslin Student Association and Comedy Club are planning an event together.

We had a lot of conversation in the past about the criteria for this extra $10,000 from the reserves for large events, in the end we just specified that it be at least 500 people and open to the community.

Proposal is to move the previously approved $4500 from co-sponsorship to instead coming from the $10,000 from reserves for large events.

Objection because line-item isn’t clear. We did vote on this policy of taking up to $10,000 from the reserves for large events, but we don’t currently have a particular line-item for it.

We follow with more discussion.

Matt McLaughlin wonders why we aren’t paying for this from the General Fee, given that if we over-allocate that it will come from reserves in the end anyway.

Polina reminds us of what happened last spring, when we funded Gran Fiesta Latina but not Persian Student Association. Creating this new policy to differentiate those two situations.

Point being that this could be funded from two sources because it is both a large event and co-sponsored. Last week we said co-sponsorship, now want to switch it to the other one, where there’s perhaps less competition, which would leave more money available for smaller co-sponsored events.

Considering the proposal again to pay the $4500 from the Large Event funds rather than then co-sponsorship funds.

There are objections because of the general idea of this extra money from reserves, and because it’s good to encourage the co-sponsorship (this is the first time the group has worked with other VSOs to put on Lunar New Year).

4 for, 4 opposed. 2 abstaning. Does not pass.

This is the first time we’ve had co-sponsorship as a separate category, might be too low, which we can figure out another time.

At the next meeting we’ll discuss whether to move more money into the co-sponsorship.

13) 7:49 Swearing in of new At-Large reps (Nanna)

Listen to this segment

Nanna leads Mary Van der Hoven and Ryan Peacock through the pledge. They are duly sworn in and can vote next week.

14) 7:50 Supplementary Funding Request ($500) for NomCom (Eric)

Listen to this segment

This request did not pass when we considered it last week, but Eric wasn’t here, so we were missing some of the info. He’s here now to fill us in.

Eric feels that these University Committees are really important to running the University. Senate and GSC felt there needed to be more training and more coordination for committee members reporting to elected bodies, which is why the committee is planning this event. Hope that having this dinner will lead to people taking this seriously.

Now, each NomCom person will directly work with representatives to particular committees, which will help with accountability and hopefully also increase in information flow.

All of NomCom started last spring, and had $3000 left in their budget, purposely didn’t spend all of it so that there would be more for the fall training events. Were then surprised when their budget left at the spring went back to ASSU reserves (because July 1 starts the new calendar year, which they didn’t know), so now they were short on what they had planned for fall.

Gives some details of the event, including the speakers, who will talk about the major issues facing the University.

$4500 of NomCom’s $7900 budget for the year going towards this. The rest would go towards recruitment in the spring. Last year spent $2700 in spring on recruitment, felt it worked well, their committees are almost full, which is rare. Think costs could be reduced this year, but want to make sure they leave money for the new NomCom team starting in the spring.

Execs have giving $500, Undergrad Senate have given $300, with $200 more conditional on us contributing.

Nanna asks about what training portion will be, both at this event and later. At event, similar committees will be seated together. Will also have speakers and specific training items alternated, and time for committee members to begin talking.

Fen concerned about high cost of event – we don’t give that much to student groups for events. Polina stresses that this is different and important to the functioning of the University.

In future, they will do requests for this event from the Stanford Fund, which suggested they’d be interested, but they’d need to apply much earlier. Also tried some other sources which didn’t pan out this year.

Ryan points out comparison to how much we give to student groups for their events, feels fine about $500 for this important thing. Also thinks that if we can make it a good event this year, next year it’ll be easier to have evidence for getting money from University.

NomCom can’t get funded from Reserves, can only come from ASSU endowment or payoff from them. If they were to ask for all their money leftover from last year, that would need to come from actual endowment, since most of the payoff has been distributed.

This request for $500 would come from general discretionary, which is payoff from ASSU endowment, so not from student fees. About $3000 there currently.

Per head cost of event will be about $60, including room rental. Tried some places like Oak Room, weren’t available.

Fen wonders if NomCom could pay for it all now, then have them ask us for more money in the spring if necessary, because then it would then be more like us funding recruitment. Eric’s point is that them paying for it now would leave less money for recruitment, and there would be a new chair needing to deal with that lack of money.

There’s an objection.
9 for, 1 opposed, 0 abstaining. Giving $500 from general discretionary passes.

15) 8:13 New Business (Polina)
No new business.